<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>healthinsurance.org &#187; public plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/tag/public-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:26:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Somebody get Harry Reid some steroids. Stat.</title>
		<link>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/11/11/somebody-get-harry-reid-some-steroids-stat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/11/11/somebody-get-harry-reid-some-steroids-stat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/?p=1243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the House passed its version of health reform legislation last week, the development may have sent chills down the spines of those who oppose the Democrats&#8217; proposed solutions. But a quick read-through of Suzy Khimm&#8217;s piece in The Treatment yesterday should be equally chilling to folks who think the battle over health reform is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/11/11/somebody-get-harry-reid-some-steroids-stat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even if states can opt out, will they?</title>
		<link>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/10/29/even-if-states-can-opt-out-will-they/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/10/29/even-if-states-can-opt-out-will-they/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/?p=1159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re happy to hear folks asking this question: If Democrats succeed in passing health reform legislation with an opt-out public option as included in Harry Reid&#8217;s Senate bill, would any states actually opt out?
Conservatives seem to like the idea that states could take a pass on a public option provision they dread. But really, Andrew [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/10/29/even-if-states-can-opt-out-will-they/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Dems haven&#8217;t led or followed, it&#8217;s time to get out of the way, columnist says</title>
		<link>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/10/26/if-dems-havent-led-or-followed-its-time-to-get-out-of-the-way-columnist-says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/10/26/if-dems-havent-led-or-followed-its-time-to-get-out-of-the-way-columnist-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/?p=1129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Democrats unite to allow an up-or-down vote on health reform legislation? Robert Creamer explained on the Huffington Post this morning why he thinks it&#8217;s in Democratic legislators&#8217; best interests to pull together. Creamer&#8217;s reasons include, briefly:

That Americans have already swung overwhelmingly in support of the public option.
A vote to defeat the filibuster isn&#8217;t a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/10/26/if-dems-havent-led-or-followed-its-time-to-get-out-of-the-way-columnist-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Option&#8217; is not a failure &#8211; not yet, anyway.</title>
		<link>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/10/23/option-is-not-a-failure-not-yet-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/10/23/option-is-not-a-failure-not-yet-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Dog Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/?p=1109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a political proposal that appeared ready to be staked in the heart by its opponents just weeks ago, the public option looked surprisingly perky this week. In fact, the only thing that now sounds optional about the proposed reform initiative is the abundance of public option options being floated.
The perkiness is due, of course, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/10/23/option-is-not-a-failure-not-yet-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota Dems cry &#8220;Bad (Blue) Dog!&#8221; &#8211; hit senator on nose with newspaper</title>
		<link>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/10/07/north-dakota-dems-cry-bad-blue-dog-hit-senator-on-nose-with-newspaper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/10/07/north-dakota-dems-cry-bad-blue-dog-hit-senator-on-nose-with-newspaper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single-payer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Dog Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health industry political contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Finance Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-payer system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/?p=972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, we know that it&#8217;s the conservative members of the House that are called &#8220;Blue Dogs&#8221; (not members of the Senate), but what a perfect visual for the actions of the North Dakota Democratic-NPL party&#8217;s put-down of its own senator, Kent Conrad (D-ND).
The party&#8217;s members recently reaffirmed a commitment to an even much more progressive health [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/10/07/north-dakota-dems-cry-bad-blue-dog-hit-senator-on-nose-with-newspaper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>19 million reasons the Senate Finance Committee bill has no public option</title>
		<link>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/10/01/19-million-reasons-the-senate-finance-committee-bill-has-no-public-option/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/10/01/19-million-reasons-the-senate-finance-committee-bill-has-no-public-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Finance Committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/?p=857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmmm. A CBS/New York Times poll says 81 percent of Democrats favor a public option; yet five Democratic senators on the Senate Finance Committee vote against it. Strange.
Go to the raw story, for the full scoop!
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/10/01/19-million-reasons-the-senate-finance-committee-bill-has-no-public-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congressman declares public option &#8220;too good&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/07/01/congressman-declares-public-option-too-good/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/07/01/congressman-declares-public-option-too-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single-payer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public plan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. John Kline (R-Minn.), newly appointed as ranking minority member of the House Education and Labor Committee, is giving Rep. Michelle Bachmann a run-for-her-money as the looniest representative from the land of 10,000 lakes.
Interviewed on Minnesota Public Radio, Kline says as far as he&#8217;s concerned, a  health reform bill with a public option is a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/07/01/congressman-declares-public-option-too-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the Democrats tear up their Golden Ticket?</title>
		<link>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/06/25/will-the-democrats-tear-up-their-golden-ticket/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/06/25/will-the-democrats-tear-up-their-golden-ticket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public plan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the health insurance industry stonewalled the Clinton Administration&#8217;s attempts to drastically overhaul our trainwreck of a health care system, Americans have been waiting.
We&#8217;ve been waiting for something nearly miraculous: a convergence of conditions that would include a frightening global economic climate; a national realization that our system is an ineffective, unfair mess; and the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2009/06/25/will-the-democrats-tear-up-their-golden-ticket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
