By Maggie Mahar
healthinsurance.org contributor
Note to readers: I welcome questions and comments, and will try my best to reply in a timely manner. I ask only that you do your part to keep our discussion reasoned and polite. – MM

Health reform critics claim Americans will soon feel "sticker shock" over climbing health premiums, but Maggie Mahar says they aren't telling the whole story … and that coverage will actually cost less for many small firms and individuals.
Health reform’s critics are sounding the alarm: in 2014, they say, health insurance premiums will climb, both for small businesses and for individuals who purchase their own coverage. “Hold onto your hat,” writes Bob Laszewski, editor of Health Care Policy and Market Place Review. “There Will Be Sticker Shock!”
Laszweski’s piece has been cross-posted on popular blogs, and his forecasts have been popping up in mainstream newspapers, including USA Today. Such wide circulation makes Laszewski’s warnings worthy of attention, and compels me to ask an important, if impertinent, question: Is what he says true?
The Congressional Budget Office expects that the ACA will have a “negligible” effect on the premiums that large employers pay for insurance, and most experts agree. But in the individual market, Laszewski claims that CBO projections show “10% to 13% premium increases.”
Here is what the CBO actually said:
“About 57 percent of people buying [their own] insurance would receive subsidies via the new insurance exchanges, and those subsidies, on average, would cover nearly two-thirds of the total premium.
“Thus, the amount that subsidized enrollees would pay would be roughly 56 percent to 59 percent lower, on average, than the premiums charged under current law.”
Wait a minute: “56 to 59 percent lower?” Where does Laszweski get “10 percent to 13 percent higher?
In the next paragraph CBO adds: “Among … enrollees who would Not receive subsidies, premiums would increase by somewhat less than 10 percent to 13 percent.”
Laszewski cherry-picks the paragraphs he quotes, and doesn’t factor in the subsidies. He does mention their existence, but only in passing: “All of these differences in premiums would be before income-based federal subsidies.” He also doesn’t admit how much of the premium the average subsidy would cover – or how many would benefit.
Laszewski also ignores out-of-pocket expenses. While some will pay higher premiums, in the individual market, preventive care will be free, and deductibles capped at $2,000.
But Laszewski doesn’t pause to do the arithmetic.
Instead, he throws out numbers based on conversations with unnamed insurance industry sources: “Expect individual health insurance rates for people in their 20s and early 30s to about double,” he warns. If you work for a small company, he asserts, “look for baseline increase of 10% to 20%.”
Recently, Laszwleksi updated his post, quoting Mark Bertolini, CEO of Aetna, who also predicts that “Health insurance premiums may … double for some small businesses and individual buyers.” On average … premiums will rise “25 percent to 50 percent.”
“I expect more health insurers to be echoing the Aetna comments” Laszewski adds. “There is a real concern in the industry they need to get out ahead of this telling people why rates are shooting up …”
Of course, insurers hope to persuade us that rate hikes are inevitable – while placing the blame on the ACA.
I doubt the industry’s strategy will work.
First, as Families USA observes: “The law creates … robust rate review systems … that can deny unreasonable premium rates or requests for increases,” and even “bar a plan from participating in an exchange.”
Massachusetts is leading the way. Recently, “two large health plans filed for rate decreases …” reports Joe Paduda.
Moreover, under the ACA, insurers selling policies to individuals and small groups must spend 80 percent of premiums dollars directly on healthcare – or mail a rebate to customers. This provision kicked in last year, leading to $1.1 billion in refunds and “substantially reduced premiums” in the individual market, the Commonwealth Fund observes.
Meanwhile, since 2010, the underlying cost of care has been sliding: from August 2011 to August 2012 national health expenditures rose just 3.8 percent. Former CBO director Peter Orszag attributes part of the decline to the ACA. If the trend continues, insurers will have difficulty justifying rate increases.
Begin with small companies: in 2016, CBO estimates they will pay anywhere 1 percent more to 2 percent less. This reflects “the net impact of many relatively small changes, some of which would tend to increase premiums, some of which would tend to reduce them.”
For example, under the ACA, employees will receive richer benefits. But their employers will be shopping in health insurance exchanges, where they will automatically become part of a “large group,” and eligible for large group rates. Today, when insurers hand-sell policies to small firms, high administrative costs force small companies to pay an average of 18 percent more than a large firm for the same policy.
In addition, some owners will qualify for tax credits; as a result, “about 12 percent of their employees” will see their premiums fall by “8 percent to 11 percent.”
In the individual market, Laszewski claims that premiums for younger customers will double because they will be supporting aging Americans.
But under reform legislation, insurers selling policies in the exchanges can still charge older Americans three times what a 30-year-old will pay. Granted, today, in some states, premiums for older customers are five or six times higher. But in nine states, age-rating is either prohibited or limited: younger customers in these states are already helping to support older Americans and shouldn’t see a sharp rise in rates.
More importantly, in all 50 states, 75 to 85 percent of exchange customers under 30 will be eligible for substantial subsidies.
Finally, keep in mind that 16 percent of today’s uninsured are children, 55 percent are under 34; and 73 percent are under 44. Ninety percent will qualify for subsidies, which is why 20-somethings and 30-somethings will join the exchanges. This “influx” of new, younger customers should slice average premiums in the individual market “by 7% to 10%” says CBO – even before you factor in the tax credits.
This is why we call it the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.”
Maggie Mahar is a financial journalist who has written extensively about the American health care system. Her book, Money-Driven Medicine: The Real Reason Health Care Costs So Much, was the inspiration for the documentary, Money Driven Medicine. She is a prolific blogger, and recently relaunched her HealthBeat Blog. Previous articles for the Health Insurance Resource Center include Obamacare’s health insurance premium subsidies and Can businesses really NOT afford Obamacare? She also provides background on Congressional health care legislation for HealthReformVotes.org, a special project of the Health Insurance Resource Center.
Tags: aca, affordable care act, health insurance premiums, individual health insurance, Maggie Mahar, premium subsidies, Robert Laszewski, small business
Posted January 3, 2013
Editor's Note: Opinions expressed on these pages are those of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the management or ownership of healthinsurance.org.
HI Maggie. Thank you for the article. My question is: What will my monthly premium be in 2014? I know, I know…That’s difficult to explain. But, is there any way to give a general answer? I am 34, non-smoker. No health conditions. I am just a normal human being. Is it safe to say I will pay less than $200 a month? Less than $150 a month? Is there any formula I can use to answer this question myself? If there is not a formula, how will anyone be able to get a premium quote? Thanks again, Jason in Arkansas
Hi Jason– As it happens, I’m in the process of writing a post for healthinsurance.org addressing this question
. The average person will pay less–but some individuals will pay more. Everything depends on your age, gender, where you live, what type of insurance you have now, whether you have insurance through your employer or buy your own, whether you suffer from a pre-existing condition, and how much you earn.
First, if you work for a large employer (more than 100 employees) and your company provides .benefits, you should see little change in your premiums, apart from normal inflation. (Right now, health care inflation is down to around 3% to 4% a year. This is much better than in the past, but drug-makers, device-makers, hospitals and doctors continue to raise their prices while over-treating some patients, and this is driving premiums up 3% to 4%. The good news is that under reform, prices for many products and services will flatten out, and we’ll be moving away from paying providers “fee for service” (which encourages them to “do more”–i.e. over-treat.)We could get health care inflation down to 2% a year–conceivably less..
The bad news is that if you don’t get benefits from a large employer, you could see your premiums rise because you live in Arkansas–a state that currently lets insurers charge people much more if they are: women, suffer from a pre-existing condition, or are “older” (in their 50s or 60s.) This applies to everyone who buys his or her own insurance, or who gets insurance through a small employer. (Under federal law, employees of large companies cannot be asked to pay more because they’re sick, female, or older.At a large company, all employees who pick a particular policy pay the same price).
But if an insurer is selling to a small company he can charge more if many of its employees are older, women, or if even a few are sick or become sick. Under the Affordable Care Act insurers will not no longer be able to charge more for pre-existing conditions, or charge women more simply because they are women. They will be able to charge older customers up to 3 times as much as they would charge you for the same policy. But today, they can charge them 5 to 6 times as much–which means that many cannot afford to buy insurance.. .
. Today, many states have laws that prohibit insurers disciminating against people in these 3 groups. Unfortunately, Arkansas is not one of them. This means that under the ACA premiums will go down for many people in these 3 groups,, while premiums are likely to go up for someone who isn’t female, isn’t older, and doesn’t suffer from a pre-existing condition, and is buying his own insurance or works for a small employer who provides benefits.
The basic concept behind insurance is that we “pool” our money which means younger healthier people help pay for the care of sicker, older people. Eventually, you’ll be older, and younger people in the pool will help pay for your care. And of course, even if you’re healthy today, tomorrow you could be in a terrible car accient–and then the other people in your pool will help pay for your care. (Under the ACA, your out of pocket expenses (co-pays and deductible) are capped at $6,000 even if you’re in the hospital for 2 months. So you won’t lose your house or go bankrupt)
Other factors to consider– , if you’re single, earn less than $44,680 and buy your own insurance, you’ll qualify for a subsidy to help cover your higher premium, and your out-of-pocket costs will be lower. (Under the ACA, preventive care is free– no co-pay or deductible applies– and deductibles are capped at $2,000.) In addition, under the ACA, both small employers and individuals buying their own insurance will automatically become part of a large pool (in the state-run Exchanges) and as a result, their premiums will be lower. (Small businesses now pay about 18% more than large companies because the administrative costs of selling to small businesses are so high. Individuals pay much more for the same reason. These are the factors that could lower your costs.
Bottom line: you’d have to take ALL of these factors into consideration when estimating whether you premiums will go up or down, and by how much.,
Sorry my response is so long–as you can see, there is no general answer.