Highlights and updates
- Open enrollment for 2019 coverage in North Dakota ended on December 15, but residents with qualifying events can still enroll.
- Short-term health plans are available in North Dakota with initial plan terms up to 185 days; a new state law requires short-term plans to allow insureds to renew their coverage, but total duration can’t exceed 12 months.
- Insurers added the cost of CSR to on-exchange silver plans for 2019, after not being allowed to add the cost of CSR to any premiums in 2018.
- North Dakota enacted legislation to create a reinsurance program and received federal approval for their 1332 waiver to implement the program as of 2020.
- Medica rejoined the exchange in North Dakota for 2019, bringing insurer participation back to where it was prior to 2018.
- Enrollment in North Dakota’s exchange increased every from 2014 through 2018, but declined in 2019.
- Insurance commissioner supported ACA repeal; conducted a study on potential state-based reform.
North Dakota exchange overview
North Dakota did not establish its own exchange, so enrollments are completed via HealthCare.gov. Three insurers offer plans in North Dakota’s exchange in 2019: Medica, Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota (Noridian), and Sanford.
Starting in 2020, North Dakota will have a reinsurance program that’s expected to result in individual market premiums that will be 8 to 20 percent lower than they would otherwise have been.
From 2015 through 2017, Noridian held the majority of the market share in the North Dakota exchange; 71 percent of 2017 enrollees were covered under Noridian plans.
North Dakota insurers added CSR cost to Silver plans for 2019; Medica rejoined the exchange and Sanford resumed statewide plan availability
For 2018, North Dakota was one of only two states where insurers were not allowed to add the cost of cost-sharing reductions (CSR) to premiums, despite the fact that the Trump Administration stopped reimbursing insurers for the cost of CSR. In most states, the cost of CSR was added to silver plans, either across the full on- and off-exchange market, or only to the on-exchange market.
On October 12, 2017, after months of dithering with the issue, the Trump Administration announced that CSR funding would end immediately. That left some insurers and states scrambling to implement appropriate premiums for 2018. Although final rates had already been transmitted to HealthCare.gov at the end of September, HHS agreed to allow, on a case-by-case basis, some insurers to refile new rates with the cost of CSR included in the premiums. Specifically, insurers in states like North Dakota that did not allow a CSR load in the initially-approved rates, were allowed the opportunity to refile new rates if state regulators permitted it.
On October 16, North Dakota Insurance Commissioner John Godfread indicated that his office was determining what course of action to take regarding the lack of CSR funding. But on October 17, the North Dakota Insurance Department announced that the previously approved rate increases would remain in place, and that they would not allow North Dakota insurers to add the cost of CSR to their premiums for 2018 (North Dakota, DC, and Vermont were the only jurisdictions where insurers were prohibited from adding the cost of CSR to premiums for 2018).
As a result, Medica left the exchange in North Dakota at the end of 2017, rather than absorb the cost of CSR without being able to add it to 2018 premiums. And Sanford sharply reduced their on-exchange coverage area to just five counties, after offering plans statewide in previous years.
Consumers are best protected when insurers add the cost of CSR to on-exchange silver plans, and allow people the option of purchasing off-exchange silver plans that don’t have the cost of CSR added to the premiums. This allows premium subsidies to grow for everyone who gets premium subsidies, including people who purchase non-silver on-exchange plans that don’t have the cost of CSR added. For people who want a silver plan and who qualify for premium subsidies, the subsidies grow to cover the added cost of CSR. And for people who want silver plans but who don’t qualify for premium subsidies, the off-exchange silver plans are a good option, as they don’t have the added premium cost to cover CSR.
About a third of the states took that option for 2018, and North Dakota joined them for 2019 (as did several other states where the 2018 approach was to add the cost of CSR to all silver plan rates, including plans sold outside the exchange). The state’s rate filing instructions for 2019 directed insurers to add the cost of CSR to on-exchange silver plans, and to the identical silver plans that are sold off-exchange. But they also instructed insurers to file “corresponding” silver plans that would only be sold off-exchange, and that don’t have the cost of CSR added to premiums.
The North Dakota Insurance Department confirmed in May 2018 that their expectation was that Medica would once again be available on-exchange in 2019; that was confirmed when Medica’s redacted rate filing became available. And Sanford expanded their coverage area to the whole state, after limiting it sharply for 2018.
Vermont, which was the other state that didn’t allow insurers to add the cost of CSR to premiums for 2018, also instructed insurers to add the cost of CSR to on-exchange silver plans for 2019 (note that DC also prohibited insurers from adding the cost of CSR to premiums for 2018, but they only have a few hundred enrollees receiving CSR benefits, so the impact of the elimination of CSR funding has been negligible in DC).
North Dakota reinsurance program will take effect in 2020 & will stabilize individual market premiums
North Dakota House Bill 1106, which called for the creation of a reinsurance program to stabilize the state’s individual insurance market, passed with unanimous support in the state House of Representatives in February 2019, and nearly unanimous (46-1) support in the Senate. It was signed into law by Governor Doug Bergum in April 2019, and heralded by Insurance Commissioner Jon Godfread as a measure that will “help ease the heavy burdens our health insurance market is facing.”
The legislation calls for the state to create a reinsurance program that will pay 75 percent of non-grandfathered individual market claims that exceed $100,000 — referred to as the attachment point. The reinsurance program will continue to pay three-quarters of the bill until the claim reaches $1 million (the $100,000 attachment point is higher than the attachment points being used in most of the other states that have created reinsurance programs, but the $1 million cap is also higher than the caps most of the other states have implemented).
Several other states — Alaska, Minnesota, Oregon, Wisconsin, Maine, Maryland, and New Jersey — have all implemented reinsurance programs using a combination of state funding and federal pass-through funding. North Dakota is one of several that are currently working to implement reinsurance programs, others include Colorado, Montana, and Pennsylvania.
It’s called pass-through funding because it’s actually federal savings that are passed through to the state. Because reinsurance results in lower premiums, the premium tax credits (subsidies) are also smaller. That saves the federal government money, and states can use 1332 waivers that allow the state to keep the savings (rather than letting the federal government keep the savings) and use it to fund the reinsurance program. Once HB1106 was enacted, North Dakota submitted a 1332 waiver proposal to the federal government in May 2019. Approval was granted at the end of July, and North Dakota’s reinsurance program will take effect as of 2020.
With the reinsurance program in place, North Dakota estimates that premiums in the individual market will be up to 20 percent lower than they would otherwise have been (the state has noted that the range is 8 to 20 percent lower), and that individual market enrollment will be 1 percent higher than it would otherwise have been. Since rate filings were due well before the state’s reinsurance proposal had gained federal approval, North Dakota’s insurance commissioner directed the state’s insurers to file two sets of rates for 2020: One based on reinsurance being enacted and the other based on the status quo. Now that the federal government has granted approval for the 1332 waiver, the North Dakota Insurance Department will use the rate filings based on the reinsurance program being in place.
For the state portion of the funding, North Dakota’s legislation calls for the state to impose an assessment on group health insurers in the state. This is a common approach that other states have successfully used. In most states, the federal pass-through funding covers the majority of the cost, but a state’s 1332 waiver proposal has to demonstrate how the state will fund its portion of the cost.
HB 1106 did not come as a surprise in 2019. Reinsurance has been gaining popularity as an option for stabilizing individual insurance markets around the country, and it’s something that North Dakota insurance regulators were discussing throughout 2018. In May 2018, North Dakota’s Insurance Commissioner, John Godfread, announced that the state’s insurance department would conduct a study to analyze various approaches to state-based health care reform.
Over the next few months, the state considered consider the possibility of expanding the existing high-risk pool, the Comprehensive Health Association of North Dakota (CHAND), as well as the possibility of implementing a state-based reinsurance program. The ACA included federal reinsurance, but it was temporary and expired at the end of 2016.
Godfread’s 2018 announcement also noted that the North Dakota Insurance Department was “analyzing Idaho’s state-based plan initiative and how a similar state-based plan allowance could operate in North Dakota. The state-based plan initiative would allow insurance carriers to offer plans, outside of the existing ACA exchange, that would be more flexible in how those plans are underwritten and designed.” It’s worth clarifying, however, that CMS blocked Idaho’s proposal, as it was not legal under the ACA.
But North Dakota was considering a modified version of what Idaho had planned to implement, as Godfread’s statement clarifies that the potential state-based plans in North Dakota “would still be required to offer all ACA mandated essential health benefits, be guaranteed issue, but would potentially allow for credits for healthy behavior or other health-related factors.”
In late September 2018, the North Dakota Insurance Department publicized their study findings. The study concluded that the two best options for North Dakota to pursue would be a state-based reinsurance program and the creation of state-based health insurance plans that insurers could sell outside the exchange. Ultimately, HB 1106 was introduced on January 3, as soon as the 2019 legislative session got underway, and was enacted in April.
Enrollment in North Dakota’s exchange
21,820 people enrolled in private plans (QHPs) through the North Dakota exchange during the open enrollment period for 2019 plans (this enrollment window ran from November 1, 2018 through December 15, 2018). That was nearly a 3 percent decrease from 2018, when 22,486 people enrolled in coverage through the North Dakota exchange during open enrollment.
But North Dakota was one of only a handful of states where exchange enrollment increased every year from 2014 through 2018. In most states that use HealthCare.gov, peak enrollment occurred in 2016, and enrollment numbers declined in 2017, 2018, and again in 2019. In North Dakota, the first decline came in 2019 (South Dakota is the only other state with a fully HHS-run exchange where enrollment grew every year from 2014 through 2018).
Here’s a look back at enrollment numbers in North Dakota’s exchange from 2014 through 2017:
- 10,597 people had enrolled in private plans through the North Dakota exchange as of April 19, 2014. This was the lowest total of any state in the country, but it was still more than double the number of North Dakota residents who had enrolled as of March 1. And in sparsely populated North Dakota, it’s not surprising that enrollment was so low; only Vermont, Wyoming, Alaska, and DC have smaller populations than North Dakota.
- 18,171 people enrolled for 2015.
- 21,604 people enrolled for 2016.
- 21,982 people enrolled for 2017 (and average premiums decreased slightly, which was very rare nationwide in 2017).
Insurer participation in North Dakota’s exchange
With Medica’s return to the exchange, North Dakota once again has three insurers offering individual market plans in the exchange, and all three insurers offer plans in most areas of the state (there are four counties in northwestern North Dakota where Medica plans are not available in 2019).
North Dakota’s exchange has had more consistent insurer participation over the years than most states. Medica, Sanford, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota (Noridian) all offered plans in 2014 — the first year the exchanges were operational — and continued to do so through 2017.
The first major change came in 2018 when Medica exited the exchange altogether. And although Sanford had offered plans statewide in previous years, they drastically reduced their coverage area in 2018. Sanford plans were only available in a total of five counties in the Fargo and Bismark areas. Residents in the rest of the state only had Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota options available.
But for 2019, insurer participation returned to what it had been in 2017, with Sanford once again offering plans statewide, and Medica offering plans in all but a few northwestern counties. Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota continues to offer plans statewide in the exchange, as they have since 2014.
Average rate changes in North Dakota’s exchange
Average rate increases for 2019 were announced by the ND Insurance Department in late September 2018:
- Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota (Noridian Mutual): On-exchange, the average rate increase was 2.29 percent, and off-exchange, it was 1.43 percent (the proposed average rate increase across all plans was 5.79 percent, but that was reduced during the rate approval process). Carriers can offer different plans on- and off-exchange, but BCBSND’s rate filing indicates that the cost of CSR was added to both on- and off-exchange silver plans, and the wording of the filing indicated that BCBSND did not opt to create different silver plans to be sold only off-exchange for 2019.
- Medica: On-exchange, the average rate increase was 25.99 percent. Off-exchange, it was 23.03 percent (the proposed average rate increases ranged from 16.3 percent to 29.9 percent). Medica only had 559 enrollees in 2018, since they only offered off-exchange plans in 2018. Enrollment was expected to increase in 2019, as their plans are once again available on-exchange nearly everywhere in the state.
- Sanford: On-exchange, the average rate increase was 21.53 percent, while off-exchange it was just 7.6 percent (proposed average rate increases ranged from 28.7 percent to 34.5 percent). Sanford had 3,300 members as of early 2018. The cost of CSR was added only to on-exchange silver plan rates for 2019, and Sanford is offering four off-exchange-only silver plans that don’t include the cost of CSR in their rates. In 2018, when most other states allowed insurers to add the cost of CSR to silver plans rates, many insurers opted to add the cost only to on-exchange silver plan rates and offer different off-exchange silver plans without the cost of CSR added to the premiums. In those cases, there was a significant difference between the on- and off-exchange average rate increases. But 2019 is the first time that North Dakota insurers were allowed to add the cost of CSR to premiums.
BCBSND, Sanford, and Medica have all continued to offer small group plans in the state, with modest rate increases. In addition, United Healthcare began offering small group health plans in North Dakota in 2019.
Here’s a look at how average rates have changed over the years in North Dakota’s exchange:
- 2014 was the first year that ACA-compliant plans were available, and the rates were essentially actuaries’ educated guesses. PricewaterhouseCooper LLC calculated weighted average rate changes from 2014 to 2015 across the entire individual market (on and off-exchange), and found an average price decrease of 3 percent in North Dakota. But if we look just at silver plans, people who had the cheapest silver plan in the ND exchange in 2014 experienced an average rate increase of about 13 percent in 2015, assuming they didn’t make any plan changes. If they were willing to switch to the new cheapest silver plan however, their rate increase was much more muted, averaging just 4 percent. And a Commonwealth Fund analysis in December 2014 found an average rate increase of 7 percent (for a 40-year-old non-smoker) across all plans and metal levels in the North Dakota exchange.
- For 2016, The overall weighted average rate increase in the North Dakota exchange was 12.2 percent, based on enrollment numbers as of September 2015.
- BCBS of ND: 12.6 percent rate increase (a reduction from the 18.4 percent rate hike they requested)
- Medica: 12.8 percent rate increase (a reduction from the 16.5 percent rate hike they requested)
- Sanford: 8.49 percent rate increase (approved as requested).
- It’s noteworthy that Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota (the dominant carrier in North Dakota’s individual market, both on and off-exchange), was profitable across all lines of business in 2015 — a reversal of course for BCBSND, which had struggled with losses in 2013 when its subsidiary, Noridian, bungled a health insurance exchange platform that they were creating for Maryland (Maryland ended their contract with Noridian in early 2014 and started over with new exchange technology that they purchased from Connecticut).
- For 2017, Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota implemented a small average rate decrease. BCBS of ND had the majority of the exchange’s enrollment, so their rate decrease meant that the overall average rate increase in North Dakota was just 1.3 percent for 2017, which was tied with Rhode Island as the lowest in the country, by far. The insurers in North Dakota’s exchange implemented the following average rate changes for 2017:
- BCBS of ND: a 1.57 percent decrease (the carrier had proposed a 1.82 percent rate increase).
- Medica: 14.3 percent increase (the carrier had proposed a 16.9 percent rate increase)
- Sanford: 7.85 percent increase (the carrier had proposed a 10.7 percent rate increase)
- In October 2017, the North Dakota Department of Insurance announced that rates for 2018 individual and small group health insurance had been finalized. ND Insurance Commissioner, Jon Godfread, who is not a fan of the ACA, states that “the heavy burdens created by Obamacare are continuing to force rates to significantly increase as time goes on,” but went on to say that the state was fortunate to still have a competitive market. The approved rates for 2018 were based on the assumption that CSR funding would continue, despite the fact that it was eliminated a few weeks before the start of open enrollment. And as noted above, insurers in North Dakota were not allowed to revise their rates to account for the loss of CSR funding. North Dakota’s exchange insurers implemented the following average rate increases for 2018:
- Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota (Noridian): 22.6 percent (proposed increase was 24 percent; BCBS/Noridian had 35,000 members, including on and off-exchange enrollment). BCBSND offered coverage statewide in 2018.
- Sanford: 7.9 percent (proposed increases were 10 percent to 13 percent, depending on the plan; Sanford had 1,200 members). Sanford sharply reduced their coverage area for 2018, only offering plans in the Fargo and Bismark areas.
Medica: 18.8 percent (approved as proposed, but only available off-exchange). Medica’s plans are only available off-exchange for 2018, and not on-exchange. Medica tried to revise their proposed rate increase to be larger once it became apparent that Congress and the Trump Administration were not taking steps to commit to CSR funding for 2018, but their request was denied by the North Dakota Insurance Department, and Medica opted to exit the exchange as a result. Medica rejoined the exchange for 2019, when they were allowed to add the cost of CSR to silver plan rates.
Navigator grants have declined sharply under the Trump Administration
Three organizations in North Dakota received a total of nearly $637,000 in navigator grants in 2015 that were used for outreach and enrollment efforts. The grants were awarded to Family HealthCare Center, Great Plains Tribal Chairmen’s Health Board, and Minot State University’s North Dakota Center for Persons with Disabilities. Residents in North Dakota can reach out to any of these organizations for in-person enrollment help.
The same three organizations again received nearly $637,000 in navigator grants in 2016. Residents in North Dakota can reach out to any of these organizations for in-person enrollment help.
The Trump Administration began reducing navigator funding in 2017 and again in 2018. When navigator grants were announced in September 2018, only one organization in North Dakota — Family HealthCare Center — received $85,000.
Grandmothered plans still exist in North Dakota, but only from Sanford
Following President Obama’s announcement in November 2013 that existing policies could be renewed into 2014 at the discretion of states and carriers, North Dakota’s Insurance Commissioner Adam Hamm decided to go along with the president’s policy cancellation “fix” and urged carriers to provide an option to renew some 36,000 individual policies that had been scheduled to terminate at the end of the year. In May 2014, he extended that allowance following the transitional relief extension issued by HHS in March (permits non-compliant coverage to be renewed until as late as October 2016, and remain in force until as late as September 2017).
But Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota – the state’s largest insurer – opted in December 2014 not to continue to renew policies that had been scheduled for termination. Their insureds had the option to switch to a new ACA compliant BCBS plan, or purchase new coverage from another carrier for 2015.
The federal government has issued extensions each year, allowing states to let grandmothered plans renew if insurers choose to continue those plans. North Dakota has gone along with each extension, so grandmothered plans can currently remain in force until the end of 2019 in the state. But as of 2018, Sanford was the only insurer that still had grandmothered plans in the state, and there were fairly few policies still in force.
North Dakota exchange history
The North Dakota House of Representative voted against a state-run health insurance exchange in 2011, and then-Gov. Jack Dalrymple’s administration reiterated that position in November 2012.
But North Dakota expanded its Medicaid program under a provision of the Affordable Care Act. Dalrymple favored the expansion, and the state House approved the measure in February 2012. Enrollment in Medicaid in North Dakota increased by 30 percent from the end of 2013 to December 2018.
North Dakota health insurance exchange links
State Exchange Profile: North DakotaThe Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation overview of North Dakota’s progress toward creating a state health insurance exchange.
North Dakota Insurance Department
Assists people insured by private health plans, Medicaid, or other plans in resolving problems pertaining to their health coverage; assists uninsured residents with access to care.
(701) 328-2440 / Toll Free: 800-247-0560 / firstname.lastname@example.org
Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org. Her state health exchange updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts.