Q. I know that the individual mandate allows for a gap in coverage as long as it’s less than three months in a year. But what if I have two gaps that are each just a month long? Or what if I’m uninsured for the last two months of one year and also the first two months of the following year?
A. There are several things to understand about the penalty exemption:
- It applies only to the first short gap in coverage during the year.
- The gap in coverage has to be less than three months in duration. If you’re uninsured for three or more months, you’ll pay a penalty for the full duration of the gap.
- If you’re insured for even a single day of a given month, you’re considered insured for that month.
- It’s very unlikely that you’ll be able to obtain a health insurance plan with a start date of anything other than the first of the month, or that you’ll be able to terminate a plan on anything other than the last day of a month.
- The IRS has addressed the possibility of a gap in coverage that spans two calendar years.
There is a long list of exemptions from the ACA’s individual mandate penalty. In fact, while about 6.5 million tax filers reported an individual mandate penalty on their 2015 tax returns, there were another 12.7 million tax filers who, despite being uninsured for at least a portion of 2015, were not assessed a penalty because they claimed an exemption instead.
One of the exemptions applies to people who experience a single short gap in coverage during the year. Let’s take a look at how this works.
Only the first gap is exempt
The exemption for a short gap in coverage seems fairly obvious at first glance, but it has some nuances that might not be readily apparent. For example, a person who is uninsured for June and July (but insured for all other months of the year) would not face a penalty, because there is just one short gap in coverage, with a duration of under three months. But a person who is uninsured in June and again in September (but insured for all other months of the year) would face a penalty for September (one-twelfth of the annual penalty amount), because only the first short gap in coverage (in this case, June) is exempt from the penalty. September would be a second gap, which is not exempt.
Three-month gap = penalty for all three months
If the gap in coverage is one or two calendar months, it’s exempt. But if it’s three calendar months, there’s no exemption, and you’ll pay a penalty for each month you were uninsured. So a three-month gap in coverage would result in a penalty equal to one-quarter (3/12) of the total annual penalty. You do not get an exemption for the first two months of the gap if the gap extends to three months or longer.
Being insured for one day = being insured for the whole month … but partial month coverage is rare
If you’re uninsured for most of a month but have minimum essential coverage for at least one day of the month, you’re considered insured for that month. But planning to obtain coverage for just a few days of a given month in order to qualify for the short gap exemption is unlikely to work. That’s because it’s virtually impossible to have a health plan end on any day other than the last day of the month, or to have a new plan start on any day other than the first day of the month.
Mid-month plan terminations do sometimes happen with loss of employer-sponsored coverage (a lay-off in the middle of the month with immediately terminated benefits, for example), but that’s rare — benefits typically continue until the end of the month. And there is no provision in the ACA-compliant individual market (on or off-exchange) for plans to end any day other than the last day of the month.
Similarly, virtually all new plans will have first-of-the-month effective dates. The only exception to this in the individual market is for a new baby or adopted child, with coverage backdated to the date of birth or adoption; otherwise, all plans are effective on the first of a given month. Plans that aren’t minimum essential coverage — like short-term health insurance, for example — often allow applicants to pick any start date they like, but obtaining coverage under these plans does not meet the individual mandate requirements.
So it would be unwise to have two full months without coverage and plan to obtain coverage mid-way through the third month. If you’re able to obtain coverage at all at that point (assuming you have access to a special enrollment period, for example), your new coverage won’t start until the first day of the fourth month — at the earliest — leaving you with a three-month gap and a penalty for all three months.
What if you’re uninsured November through February?
What if you’re uninsured in November, December, January, and February? (A total of four months, but only two in each calendar year?) You would be assessed a penalty for being uninsured in the second year, but not in the first. (More details in this document on page 53654.)
The end date of a period without health coverage is never later than December 31, even if you remain uninsured after that date. So for the first year, your uninsured period would be counted as two months (November and December) and would be exempt from the shared responsibility provision because it’s less than three months.
But the start date for an uninsured period begins when you become uninsured, even if that date is prior to January 1. So for the second year, your uninsured window would be counted from November of the prior year, and would include a four-month period. Thus, you would not qualify for the exemption for a short gap in coverage. However, your prorated penalty for the second tax year would only apply to January and February, since November and December were in a prior tax year. Thus, your penalty would be one-sixth of the total penalty you would have paid if you had been uninsured for the full year (you can use this penalty calculator to get specific numbers).
The purpose of the shared responsibility provision – or individual mandate – is to make sure that as many people as possible are in the health insurance pool at all times, and to avoid the adverse selection that would arise if people waited to enroll in a health plan until they were in need of care (open enrollment windows are the other mechanism that prevents adverse selection). From that perspective, a four-month gap in coverage is deleterious to the overall risk pool, regardless of when it occurs during the year.