New York has fully embraced the ACA, with a state-run exchange, expanded Medicaid, and the Essential Plan (a Basic Health Program; details below). The state-run exchange is called New York State of Health. It is one of the most robust exchanges in the country, with 17 carriers offering plans for 2017 (there are a total of 14 different companies, as some of the participating carriers are subsidiaries of the same parent company. Plan availability also varies considerably from one county to another). All of the insurers that offer exchange plans in 2017 have filed plans for continued exchange participation in 2018.
New York also requires insurers to spend at least 82 percent of premiums (for individual and small group coverage) on medical costs, which is more stringent than the federal requirement of 80 percent.
And starting in 2018, broker commissions on all individual and small group plans in New York must be capped at no more than 4 percent of premiums. This was already the case for HMOs in New York, but a May 2017 notice to insurers indicates that rate filings for 2018 that include broker commissions above 4 percent will be deemed unreasonable (broker commissions nationwide are much lower than they were prior to 2011, when the ACA’s medical loss ratio rules took effect; in some areas, like Connecticut, for example, broker commissions are no longer paid for any plans, leading to fewer brokers being willing or able to serve the individual market).
New York takes action to protect essential health benefits, community rating, and access to exchange plans
In early 2017, as the Trump Administration took over, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced that the state would continue to require contraceptive coverage on state-regulated plans, regardless of federal rules (details below). And in June, Cuomo went further, directing the NY Department of Financial Services to issue regulations that would require New York plans to continue to cover the ACA’s essential health benefits and prevent insurers from discriminating against applicants with pre-existing conditions.
It’s notable that New York already had community rating (ie, protection against discrimination based on medical history) long before the ACA. And New York was one of the states that was least likely to pursue waivers under the American Health Care Act. But in states that choose to seek waivers, the House version of the AHCA would allow for a less stringent definition of essential health benefits, and premiums based on medical history if applicants had a gap in coverage prior to enrolling. These are not waivers that New York was ever likely to seek, but the Governor’s actions help to cement New York’s position in favor of the ACA’s consumer protections.
Under Cuomo’s orders, New York is also stepping up their safeguard to ensure that New York State of Health remains a robust exchange with numerous participating insurers. If insurers choose to stop offering QHPs (private plans) in the exchange, the new regulations will prevent them from participating in any of the other programs that are linked with the exchange, including Medicaid, Child Health Plus, and the Essential Plan (New York’s Basic Health Program; details below). These programs tend to be more profitable than QHPs, so this is an incentive for insurers to continue to offer QHPs in the exchange.
New York already has one of the most robust exchanges in the country, but the new regulations will help to protect that status. At the end of 2016, Wellcare stopped offering QHPs in New York State of Health, but continued to offer the Essential Plan. Under the new regulations, similar moves from other insurers will not be permitted in the future, starting with the 2018 coverage year. However, New York’s current Medicaid managed care contracts run through February 2019, and it’s unclear if insurers would contest the new rules being applicable to 2018 exchange participation. But for now, all of the insurers that offer plans in NY State of Health have filed rates and plans for continued exchange participation in 2018.
Nevada previously required its Medicaid managed care insurers to offer QHPs in the exchange, but switched in 2017 to a Medicaid managed care bidding system that awards additional points to insurers that agree to offer QHPs. As a result, Nevada’s exchange is one of the few that didn’t lose any insurers heading into 2017, and is slated to gain two new insurers for 2018. Nevada and New York are the only states where UnitedHealthcare
UnitedHealthcare currently offers exchange plans in just three states — Virginia, Nevada, and New York — after exiting exchanges in 31 states at the end of 2016. United will exit the Virginia exchange at the end of 2017, but has filed plans to continue to offer exchange coverage in New York and Nevada — both states where United has a Medicaid managed care contract and where those contracts are linked to exchange participation.
Looking ahead to 2018: All insurers plan to remain in exchange, but repealing the individual mandate will drive rates much higher
Open enrollment for 2018 coverage will run from November 1, 2017 through December 15, 2017, with all plan effective January 1, 2018. Rate filings for 2018 coverage were due in New York by May 15, 2017 , and can be found on the NY Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) rate application portal.
NY Upstate reported on May 15 that insurers in New York would be requesting “double-digit rate hikes because of continued increases in health care costs and uncertainty related to federal discussions surrounding repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act,” according to the NY Health Plan Association (note that average rate increases in NY were double-digit for 2017, but overall rates are still considerably lower than they were in 2013; details below).
If the individual mandate were to be repealed (as would be the case if the House version of the the American Health Care Act (AHCA) were to be enacted), rates would climb considerably higher. In their summary of rate filings for 2018, NYDFS included this:
“to prepare for potential changes to the Affordable Care Act, DFS requested that insurers provide estimates as to how the impact of a potential repeal of the individual mandate and the loss of Cost Share Reduction (CSR) funding would affect rates. Of those that provided numerical estimates, on average, insurers estimated that a full repeal of the federal individual mandate would increase rates by an additional 32.6% and the loss of CSR funding would increase rates an additional 1.3%.“
The elimination of CSR funding would have less of an impact in New York than it would in most other states (for example, Pennsylvania regulators have estimated that loss of CSR funding would increase premiums by more than 20 percent). That’s likely because New York has implemented the Essential Plan, which covers people with income up to 200 percent of the poverty level (more details below). CSR is available to people with income up to 250 percent of the poverty level, but its impact is much smaller when incomes are above 200 percent of the poverty level. In most states, people with income up to 200 percent of the poverty level are eligible for substantial CSR benefits, but that’s not the case in New York, since those residents are instead eligible for the Essential Plan.
Insurer’s in New York’s individual market have proposed the following average rate increases for 2018 exchange plans:
- Affinity Health Plan: 23.5 percent
- Care Connect (North Shore—LIJ): 29.7 percent
- Capital District Physicians’ Health Plan: 15.2 percent
- Emblem (Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York): 24.9 percent
- Empire HealthChoice HMO: filing was still being evaluated by NYDFS as of June 13 and was not yet public
- Excellus Health Plan: 4.4 percent
- Fidelis Care New York: 8.5 percent
- Healthfirst PHSP: 22.1 percent
- HealthNow New York: 47.3 percent
- Independent Health Benefits Corporation: 25.9 percent
- Metro Plus Health Plan: 7.9 percent
- MVP Health Plan: 13.5 percent
- Oscar: 11.1 percent
- UnitedHealthcare of New York: 38.5 percent
Two insurers have filed off-exchange plans with the following average rate increases:
- Crystal Run: 8.7 percent
- HealthFirst Insurance Company: 13 percent
NYDFS noted that the weighted average proposed rate increase for the individual market is 16.6 percent. As always, these average rate increases would apply to full-price rates, and would be fully or partially offset by larger premium subsidies for subsidy-eligible enrollees.
But as noted above, rates will be substantially higher if the individual mandate penalty is eliminated. New York already has experience with a guaranteed-issue market without an individual mandate, as that’s what they had in place for two decades prior to the ACA. Premiums were much higher in New York in those days, because there was no requirement that healthy people maintain coverage. Eliminating the individual mandate penalty would push premiums — in New York and elsewhere — much higher than they are with the individual mandate in place.
The AHCA faces an uncertain future in the Senate, and the CBO has projected that it would result in 23 million additional uninsured people in the U.S. by 2026 (as opposed to keeping the ACA in place). The AHCA includes provisions that would allow states to opt out of some ACA consumer protections: essential health benefits could be redefined, and rates could be based on medical history if applicants had a gap in coverage during the previous year.
There is essentially no chance, however, that New York would opt to waive consumer protections if the AHCA were to be enacted. New York already had community rating in place for two decades before ACA-compliant plans became available in 2014, and the state has already taken steps to protect access to contraceptives on state-regulated health plans (details below), a prescient decision in light of the leaked regulation indicating that the Trump Administration intends to scale back the ACA’s contraceptive coverage mandate.
Open enrollment for 2017 coverage began on November 1, 2016, and continued until the end of January. On February 1, New York State of Health published an enrollment report, noting that January 31, 2017 was the busiest day they had ever had. Total enrollment through the exchange (including Medicaid, the Essential Plan, Child Health Plus, and private plans) reached more than 3.6 million by January 31, an increase of 800,000 over the enrollment total at the end of last year’s open enrollment period. By January 31, 2017, enrollment totals through NY State of Health were as follows:
- 242,880 people had enrolled in private health plans (QHPs; more than 60 percent are receiving premium subsidies)
- 665,324 people had enrolled in the Essential Plan (details below)
- 299,214 people had enrolled in Child Health Plus
- 2,427,375 people had enrolled in Medicaid
That total is an increase of 200,000 people since December 24, when NY State of Health reported that more than 3.4 million people had enrolled.
On January 4, Governor Cuomo reported that more than 2.7 million people in New York would lose coverage if the ACA is repealed and not replaced with something equally robust. That tally is likely even higher now, given the surge in enrollments in January.
NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio was pushing for an additional 50,000 sign-ups for 2017, noting that the city’s hospital system will be in better financial shape with more insured patients, and that the more people who are enrolled, the harder it will be for lawmakers to strip away coverage. City workers in NYC were going door to door in December and January in an effort to reach people who weren’t aware of their eligibility for coverage in New York under the ACA (this may have played a role in the surging enrollment volume that NY State of Health experienced in January).
Governor Cumo takes action to protect contraceptive and abortion coverage; AHCA tax credits should still be available
Although the future of the ACA is still very much up in the air, Governor Cuomo announced state regulatory action on January 21 that protects ongoing access to contraceptive coverage with no cost-sharing, and coverage for medically-necessary abortions with no cost-sharing (with exceptions for religious groups). The regulations (here and here) were published in the state register on February 8, 2017, and a public comment period ran through March 27, 2017. They took effect on April 8, 2017 (60 days after their publication in the state register).
The state regulation will still be in place even if the ACA is repealed, but it only applies to health plans that are regulated by the state, which includes the individual market, and fully-insured group plans. But self-insured group plans are regulated by the federal government under ERISA. The ACA requires contraceptive coverage with no cost-sharing on all non-grandfathered (and non-grandmothered) plans, including self-insured plans (the ACA does not, however, require abortion coverage). But New York’s state-based regulations would only apply to plans that are regulated by the state; self-insured plans would not have to comply.
Within days of Cuomo’s announcement of the pending regulatory action, insurers were calling it an “unprecedented use of regulatory authority” and expressed their belief that legislation would be a more suitable channel for such changes. Earlier in January, NY’s Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman, introduced S.3668, the Comprehensive Contraception Coverage Act of 2017. The legislation was still in committee as of early June (the session adjourns June 21), but if enacted, it would codify via legislation many of the same benefits called for in Cuomo’s regulatory action.
At the same time that New York has been working to protect ACA provisions, Republicans in Congress have been working to repeal and replace the ACA. The House version of the AHCA includes premiums tax credits that are explicitly unavailable for plans that cover abortion. Technically, ACA tax credits also cannot be used for most abortion coverage, due to the long-standing Hyde Amendment (only abortions due to rape or incest, or to protect the life of the mother, can be funded with federal dollars). As a workaround for ACA tax credits, insurers have to bill separately for abortion coverage beyond the scope of the Hyde Amendment, and that separate bill cannot be offset by premium subsidies. This has worked fairly well across the country thus far.
But the AHCA is more explicit in its prohibition on using the tax credits for plans that cover abortion; it appears that insurers would have to have separate plans, or riders, for abortion coverage, rather than just billing separately.
So how does this work in New York, where the new regulations require coverage for “medically necessary” abortions on all state-regulated plans? (keeping in mind that all plans in the individual market, where tax credits — both ACA and AHCA — apply, are state-regulated).
Some have expressed concerns that New York’s new rule would make residents in the state ineligible for AHCA tax credits, due to the state’s abortion coverage requirement. The New York regulations are specific in terms of only requiring coverage for medically necessary abortions. If that’s defined as abortions to protect the mother’s life, those are already exempted under the Hyde Amendment, and are also exempted under the AHCA’s rule that would prevent tax credits from being used on plans that cover abortion. But NYDFS explained via email that “medical necessity would be defined within the policy contract and apply to all medical services. A utilization review or medical review would be required to make this determination.” So it may extend well beyond abortions to protect the mother’s life, in which case there could be a conflict with AHCA tax credits.
Plans that cover abortions that aren’t deemed medically necessary (which is not required under New York’s new regulations) would certainly have to make changes in order to be eligible for tax credits under the AHCA. It appears that instead of just billing separately for the abortion coverage, they would need to switch to offering two separate policies, or possibly an abortion rider.
In somewhat related news, in February 2017, a NY Department of Financial Services undercover sting found that 11 out of 15 insurers were providing incorrect or misleading information to enrollees regarding coverage of contraceptives. NYDFS was working to ensure that the insurers took corrective action.
NY Assembly passes single-payer bill for the 4th time; Senate unlikely to pass
New York expanded Medicaid under the ACA, implemented a state-run exchange, and is one of only two states that have implemented a Basic Health Program (BHP) under the ACA (the Essential Plan, details below). This puts New York ahead of almost all other states in implementing the ACA and healthcare reform. But advocates for single-payer healthcare have been hard at work in the state for the last few years, pushing for more comprehensive reform to cover everyone.
New York lawmaker Richard Gottfried (D-Manhattan) has been working for years on a plan for single-payer health care in the state, co-sponsoring – with Senator Bill Perkins – legislation that would create a universal coverage program known as “New York Health” and hosting a series of public hearings on the proposed plan.
Gottfried and Perkins introduced their bill four years ago, in March 2013 (although Gottfried has been introducing similar bills since the 90s), and 83 other lawmakers signed on to co-sponsor it. Gottfried initially said the switch to single-payer would save $20 billion a year, but a new study in March 2015 found that the annual savings under a single payer plan would actually reach $45 billion, and would result in savings for 98 percent of NY residents.
In May 2015, the New York state Assembly voted 89-47 in favor of Gottfried’s New York Health Act, but the Republican-controlled Senate did not take up the measure. The same thing happened in 2016, with the single-payer proposal passing the Assembly but failing to gain any traction in the Senate. So while the successful votes were certainly a victory for universal health care, they have been symbolic victories thus far.
But in light of the Trump Administration and Republican-controlled Congress pushing to repeal and replace the ACA, Gottfried introduced his New York Health Care Act (A.4738) again in February 2017. In mid-May, it passed the Assembly by a wide margin (93-46), and was sent to the Senate, where it faces an uphill challenge.
In the Senate, Gustavo Rivera (D, 33rd Senate District) introduced similar legislation (S.4840) in early March, but it was still in committee as of June 1. In addition to Rivera, 29 other senators have co-sponsored the legislation (including all eight members of the Independent Democratic Conference), but 32 are needed for a majority. A special election in May added another Democratic senator, Brian Benjamin, who supports S.4840, but that’s still one vote short of passage.
Gottfried has pointed out that the GOP proposal to allow plans to be sold across state lines essentially boils down to eliminating states’ rights to regulate their own market, and that a state like NY (which has strict consumer protection laws in place) would be flooded with sub-par plans originating in states with much more lax regulations. Gottfried explains that the result would be much lower-quality coverage for people in New York, and that his New York Health Act would provide much better coverage.
Vermont was on a path to single-payer health care, but pulled the plug in late 2014 amid cost and taxation concerns. Colorado had an initiative on the ballot in 2016 that would have created a universal healthcare system in the state, but it was soundly defeated by voters. Creating a single-payer system as a single state is admittedly a challenging proposition, but New York’s much larger population might make it more feasible than it is in smaller states.
Coverage still much less expensive than it was in 2013
New York was one of just five states that required coverage to be guaranteed-issue prior to the ACA. As a result, premiums skyrocketed in the two decades prior to ACA implementation.
Now that coverage is guaranteed-issue nationwide under the ACA, other states are seeing premiums that continue to rise above where they were in 2013, when coverage was still medically underwritten. But New York officials report that 2017 coverage is still 55 percent less expensive (adjusted for inflation, and before any subsidies are applied) than it was in 2013, and the market is much more robust than it was pre-ACA in terms of carrier participation.
Although coverage is less expensive in New York than it was prior to 2014, there are still people — mainly those who earn only slightly too much to be eligible for subsidies in the exchange — who struggle to afford health insurance. Four lawmakers (three Republicans and one Democrat) in the NY Assembly introduced A.1184 in January 2017, in an effort to provide a tax credit to offset the cost of coverage. The bill, which was still in committee as of early February, would provide a non-refundable state tax credit for the amount paid in premiums, up to $2,400 per family (the cap would be $800 each for the tax filer and spouse, and up to $400 per child, with the $2,400 cap applying to the whole family).
2017 rates and carriers
The weighted average rate increase for the individual market in New York was 16.6 percent for 2017, but more than half of the exchange’s private plan enrollees are receiving premium subsidies, which offset a portion of the rate hike. Nationwide, the average pre-subsidy premium increase was about 25 percent for 2017, so although NY had a double-digit average increase, premiums in the state are more stable than they are in other states.
New York State of Health—noted that the plans available in 2017 are “largely the same” as the plans available through the exchange in 2016 (this chart from NY State of Health shows which carriers have plans available in each county in 2016, and this one shows 2017 coverage).
WellCare exited the individual QHP market at the end of 2016, but is continuing to offer the Essential Plan (details below) in New York. Their enrollee count in exchange QHPs was only about 1,000 members in 2016.
In May 2016, the New York Department of Financial Services published a list of the proposed rate changes for all of the state’s individual and small group carriers, including both on and off-exchange plans. In the individual market, the initial proposed weighted average rate increase was 17.3 percent, and in the small group market, it was 12 percent. These rate filings were later revised by the carriers, and final rate approval was published by the NYDFS in early August.
For plans sold through New York State of Health, the following average rate increases were approved for 2017:
- Affinity Health Plan: 22.4 percent (initial rate increase request was 20.7 percent, revised to 24.8 percent)
- Capital District Physicians’ Health Plan: 13.9 percent (initial rate increase request was 11.2 percent, revised to 13.1 percent)
- Empire HealthChoice HMO: 15.2 percent (initial rate increase request was 25.1 percent)
- Excellus Health Plan: 15.4 percent (initial rate increase request was 15.9 percent)
- Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York: 13.9 percent (initial rate increase request was 14 percent)
- Healthfirst PHSP: 7.4 percent (initial rate increase request was 6.6 percent, revised to 6.5 percent)
- HealthNow New York: 8.7 percent (initial rate increase request was 6.1 percent, revised to 12.9 percent)
- Independent Health Benefits Corporation: 19.6 percent (initial rate increase request was 19.2 percent)
- Metro Plus Health Plan: 29.2 percent (initial rate increase request was 20.3 percent)
- MVP Health Plan: 6 percent (initial rate increase request was 6.1 percent)
- Fidelis Care New York: 11.6 percent (initial rate increase request was 8.1 percent, revised to 13 percent)
- North Shore-LIJ CareConnect Insurance Company: 29.2 percent (approved without changes)
- Oscar: 19.6 percent (initial rate increase request was 18.4 percent, revised to 20.9 percent; Oscar was also planning to reduce its network size by about half for 2017; the new network has 31 hospitals, down from 77 in 2016. Oscar offers plans in nine New York counties).
- UnitedHealthcare of New York: 28 percent (initial rate increase request was 45.6 percent; United is staying in the New York exchange, which is not the case in most states. They have about 4 percent of the exchange market share in New York)
Regulators noted that the overall impact of their rate review was a reduction in the magnitude of the average rate increase for 2017, although the rates they finalized for some carriers were higher than the proposed rates the carriers had filed. At ACA Signups, Charles Gaba calculated a weighted average rate increase of 16.6 percent for the individual market in New York (including on and off-exchange carriers). This is a little lower than the 17.3 percent weighted average proposed rate increase that the carriers initially filed in May.
All but two of the individual market carriers in New York offer plans in the exchange, but more than half of the small group plans only offer coverage outside the exchange. In the individual market, the two carriers that are only off-exchange (Aetna and Crystal Run) proposed rate increases that were higher than the weighted average (19.4 percent and 89.1 percent, respectively). Ultimately, NYDFS approved an 8 percent rate increase for Aetna, and an 80.5 percent rate increase for Crystal Run.
This is the third year in a row that regulators in New York approved a smaller overall rate hike than carriers had requested. For 2016, health plans in NY’s individual market proposed average rate increases of 10.4 percent, and regulators approved an average rate increase of 7.1 percent. The year before, the difference was even more significant: carriers proposed an average rate increase of 12.5 percent for 2015, but regulators only approved an average increase of 5.7 percent. But NYDFS has a new superintendent who took the helm in January 2016, and the agency has also come under fire for approving Health Republic’s rates that were — in hindsight — too low (more details below).
UnitedHealthcare is continuing to offer exchange coverage in 14 New York counties in 2017. They offered exchange plans in 34 states in 2016, but exited all but three of them at the end of 2016. Their proposed 45.6 percent rate increase for 2017 got trimmed down to 28 percent by NYDFS, but they are continuing to offer coverage.
In 2015, sixteen carriers offered coverage in the individual market through New York State of Health, and nine carriers offered small business coverage through the SHOP exchange (carriers’ phone numbers and provider network links are available here).
American Progressive Life and Health Insurance Company of NY didn’t offer policies for 2015 after gaining a very small market share in 2014, but WellCare joined the exchange in 2015. For 2016, Health Republic was no longer available, and WellCare exited the individual market in New York at the end of 2016.
The Essential Plan: Enrollment exceeds 665,000
In April 2015, New York State of Health announced that they would introduce a Basic Health Program (BHP) for 2016 dubbed the “Essential Plan.” Enrollment in the Essential Plan began on November 1, 2015 for coverage effective January 1, 2016. BHPs are an option available to all states under the ACA, but thus far, only New York and Minnesota have received federal approval for their BHPs.
In New York, the BHP is available from a variety of private carriers, has no deductible, and has no premium for enrollees with incomes up to 150 percent of the federal poverty level. Enrollees with incomes at 200 percent of the federal poverty level paid just $20 per month in premiums in 2016, and that has not changed for 2017. Prior to 2016, enrollees with incomes between 138 percent and 200 percent of poverty were eligible for premium subsidies and cost-sharing subsidies, but switching to the BHP has likely resulted in lower premiums and lower cost-sharing for many of them.
About 40 percent of NY State of Health’s private plan enrollees in 2015 had incomes below 200 percent of the poverty level. They became eligible instead for the Essential Plan in 2016, which is a more affordable option than the coverage they had in 2015. By January 31, 2016 enrollment in the Essential Plan had reached nearly 380,000 people. Essential Plan enrollment continues year-round, and by November 2016, enrollment had grown to 565,000 people. By January 31, 2017, it had reached 665,324.
2016 market share in the exchange
According to the 2016 enrollment report published by NY State of Health, Fidelis Care had the largest market share in the exchange, with 26 percent of QHP enrollees. Empire BCBS, Oscar, MetroPlus, and Healthfirst each had 10 percent of the QHP enrollees in the exchange; those five carriers have two-thirds of the overall exchange market share. The remaining third was spread across 13 carriers.
2.8 million enrolled through NY State of Health
As of January 31, 2016 — the end of the 2016 open enrollment period — more than 2.8 million people were enrolled in health coverage through New York State of Health, although fewer than ten percent of them were enrolled in QHPs, and the vast majority were enrolled in Medicaid:
- 271,964 were enrolled in private qualified health plans (QHPs). Effectuated enrollment as of March 31 stood at 224,014.
- 379,559 were enrolled in the state’s new Essential Plan (a Basic Health Program – details below)
- 215,380 were enrolled in Child Health Plus
- 1,966,920 were enrolled in Medicaid (as of January 15, 2016 Special Needs Plans are available through NY State of Health for Medicaid-eligible enrollees who have HIV or who are homeless).
Open enrollment for 2016 ended on January 31. But applicants who experienced a qualifying event, could enroll after that, and Native Americans can enroll in QHPs year-round. Applicants who are eligible for the Essential Plan, Medicaid, or Child Health Plus can enroll at any point in the year.
Enrollment in QHPs at the end of the 2016 open enrollment period was significantly lower than it was at the end of the 2015 open enrollment period, when more than 407,000 people had enrolled in QHPs. But that’s due to the fact that the Essential Plan only became available for 2016. It covers people with incomes between 138 percent and 200 percent of the poverty level – all of whom were eligible for subsidized QHPs in 2015, and are instead eligible for the Essential Plan in 2016.
The advent of the Essential Plan also reduced the percentage of QHP enrollees who are receiving premium subsidies. For 2015, 70 percent of QHP enrollees in New York State of Health were receiving premium subsidies, whereas for 2016, only 55 percent of effectuated enrollees (as of March 31) had premium subsidies. That’s because the whole population eligible for the Essential Plan was previously eligible for premium subsidies, but are now enrolled in the Essential Plan instead.
At the end of the 2015 open enrollment period, total enrollment through NY State of Health stood at 2.1 million – significantly lower than the 2.8 million total for 2016. Of those, 564,315 had coverage in QHPs and Child Health Plus. For comparison, during the 2016 open enrollment period, nearly 867,000 people enrolled in QHPs, Child Health Plus, and the Essential Plan.
New York is one of several states where the exchange offers standardized plan designs. Insurers that offer plans through New York State of Health must offer one standard plan design in each metal level in every county where the insurer offers plans. Carriers are also allowed to offer up to three non-standard plan designs in each metal level.
Because of adjustments to the AV calculator, the standardized bronze plan that had been HSA-eligible was no longer compatible with HSA rules. To prevent people from losing access to their HSAs, New York State of Health allowed carriers that offered the standard bronze HSA-qualified plan in 2015 to continue to offer an additional bronze plan in 2016 that’s HSA-compatible. There has been some concern that standardized plan designs—which will be introduced in the federally-run exchange for 2017—could result in the demise of HSA-qualified plans, but New York’s work-around demonstrates how adjustments can be made to ensure that HSA-qualified plans remain available to consumers.
SHOP exchange open to businesses with up to 100 employees
As of January 2016, the NY State of Health SHOP exchange for small businesses is open to employers with up to 100 employees. Prior to 2016, only businesses with up to 50 employees could use the SHOP exchange.
New York is one of just a handful of states where businesses with 51 – 100 employees are now considered small groups. Although that was originally intended to be the case in every state as of January 2016, Congress reversed course in late 2015 with the PACE Act (HR1624), which kept the definition of “small group” at businesses with a maximum of 50 employees. But New York had passed its own law in 2013 to align the definition of small group with what was called for in the ACA, calling for the definition change in 2016. And the PACE Act had no impact on New York’s law, so businesses with up to 100 employees can use NY State of Health’s SHOP exchange.
While that’s beneficial for some groups, and helps to further stabilize the small group market, it also means that businesses with 51 – 100 employees are not allowed to self-insure as large groups, and some businesses are unhappy with the rule change. The switch doesn’t impact the employer mandate; businesses with 50 or more employees are required to provide coverage to their employees or face a penalty – that applies regardless of whether they’re in a state that classifies them as small groups or large groups.
Pregnancy now a qualifying event
In June 2015, the New York state Assembly and Senate unanimously passed S. 5972. And on December 22, 2015, Governor Cuomo signed the legislation into law. The legislation makes pregnancy a qualifying event through the state-run exchange, New York State of Health, and took effect in January 2016. New York is the first state in the nation where the commencement of pregnancy allows a woman to enroll in a plan through the exchange. The new law will allow a pregnant woman to enroll with an effective date of the first of the month in which her pregnancy is confirmed by a licensed healthcare provider.
Under federal ACA rules, a baby’s birth triggers a qualifying event, but pregnancy does not. Advocates have pushed for the inclusion of pregnancy in the list of qualifying events at a federal level, but although HHS considered that possibility, they noted in February 2015 that they had opted not to include pregnancy as a qualifying event. That could still change in the future however, and the success of the legislation in New York will certainly put pressure on other state-run exchanges to follow suit.
California lawmakers also considered similar legislation, although it was more specific in terms of what would be allowed, and it wouldn’t have gone into effect until 2017. Initially, the California bill clarified that only women without minimum essential coverage would be allowed to enroll upon becoming pregnant – so the qualifying event triggered by pregnancy would have been more limited than a regular qualifying event that allows people to switch from one plan to another (New York’s legislation does not have that sort of qualifying language, women in New York will have the option not only to enroll for the first time, but also to switch to another plan at the commencement of pregnancy). Ultimately, lawmakers in California did not move forward with the bill as originally written. Instead, they changed the language to state that people who were declined for coverage (because they applied outside of open enrollment) should be referred to the state’s high risk pool, which is still operational. California also has a Medicaid program for pregnant women with income up to 322 percent of the poverty level, and enrollment is year-round.
New York is tied with Hawaii for having the highest rate of unintended pregnancies in the country (61 percent). Advocates have cheered the new legislation in New York, noting that pre-natal care increases the odds of a healthy, full-term pregnancy, and that unintended pregnancies necessitate the option to enroll in health coverage when a pregnancy is confirmed. But there are also concerns that this “loophole” in the enrollment system could result in adverse selection and higher premiums, since women will be able to wait until they’re pregnant – and in need of healthcare – to enroll in coverage. The ACA’s penalty for being uninsured will still apply to women who are uninsured during a given year for a period of more than two months.
SEP for victims of domestic violence or spousal abandonment
As of April 15, 2016, victims of domestic violence or spousal abandonment, along with their dependents, are eligible for a special enrollment period during which they can obtain coverage through NY State of Health. If they’re eligible for the Essential Plan, Child Health Plus, or Medicaid, enrollment is available year-round anyway; but if not, they’ll have an opportunity to purchase a QHP outside of open enrollment.
Carriers cannot impose a time limit on when the domestic violence or spousal abandonment occurred, nor can they “require any additional proof of eligibility or apply overly burdensome requirements on applicants seeking to use the special enrollment period.”
This is consistent with the regulations HHS established that allow victims of domestic violence or spousal abandonment to enroll in a plan through the exchange outside of open enrollment.
Some carriers cut commissions
But three of the carriers — United Healthcare of New York (including Oxford), Oscar, and Empire BCBS — reduced or eliminated broker commissions for plans sold in 2016, indicating that they would prefer to not sell a significant number of plans – particularly outside of open enrollment. Empire’s commission cuts apply to plans sold after the end of open enrollment (effective dates of April 1 or later).
Carriers nationwide have noted that enrollees who sign up during special enrollment periods (triggered by qualifying events) are using 55 percent more services than people who enroll during open enrollment. There has been significant concern that qualifying events are not being enforced as strictly as they should be, and that people have essentially been able to “game” the system and wait until they’re sick to enroll. CMS began working to step up enforcement of special enrollment period eligibility in 2016, and is continuing to do so in 2017. But that verification process applies in states that use HealthCare.gov, not in states like New York that have their own exchange.
On July 31, New York published final rate changes for both the individual and small group market, including plans that are sold through NY State of Health, the state’s ACA-created state-run exchange.
In the individual market, carriers had requested an average rate increase of 10.4 percent, but regulators knocked that down to 7.1 percent. Health Republic initially had the highest approved rate increase (14 percent), but they are no longer selling plans and their existing plans terminated at the end of November 2015 (details below). Since all of Health Republic’s individual enrollees had to switch to other carriers during open enrollment, the final weighted average rate increase ended up being less than the 7.1 percent that regulators had initially stated.
Of the 16 carriers in New York’s individual market in 2015, 15 offered plans through NY State of Health. Across those 15 plans (including Health Republic, which is no longer in business), approved rate changes varied from a decrease of more than 10 percent (Independent IHBC) to an increase of 13.2 percent (Empire HMO).
Five carriers’ rates were approved as proposed, but regulators reduced the requested rates for the remaining carriers. In some cases, the reduction was quite significant; for example, United had proposed a 22 percent increase, and the final approved rate was just a 1.65 percent increase.
Four exchange carriers (Health Now, Independent IHBC, Metro Plus, and Wellcare) have lower average rates in 2016 than they did in 2015.
The state closely scrutinized the filed rate requests, and ended up approving lower rates than carriers requested, the same as the did the previous year. Rates only increased an average of 5.7 percent for 2015, but carriers had initially requested average hikes of 12.5 percent.
The New York Health Plan Association has stated that the final rate increases for 2015 were lower than the increase in claims costs, and they’ve expressed disappointment that state regulators once again reduced the proposed rate changes from insurers. NYHPA President and CEO, Paul Macielak, said that the approved rates for 2016 “continue an artificial suppressing of rates merely to support the claim that New York is keeping premium increases ‘below the average increase in health care costs’ which doesn’t make sense.”
State regulators reiterated the fact that premiums continue to be nearly 50 percent lower than they were prior to 2014, although that’s because New York enacted healthcare reform more than two decades ago, implementing guaranteed-issue coverage for all enrollees. But they did not have an individual mandate or premium subsidies, which meant premiums in New York’s individual market were dramatically higher than the national average prior to 2014.
The majority of New York State of Health’s enrollees are receiving premium subsidies, and those subsidies mute the impact of rate increases as long as consumers take the time to shop around during open enrollment. Open enrollment for 2016 continues until January 31. State of Health projected that their total private plan enrollment will be up to 615,000 people by the end of 2016, but it’s not clear if they were accounting for Essential Plan enrollments in that total (and the fact that QHP enrollments have declined correspondingly).
NY’s CO-OP plans terminated November 30, 2015
On September 25, regulators announced that Health Republic of New York, an ACA-created CO-OP, would cease sales and begin winding down its operations. The CO-OP was the fourth CO-OP nationwide to succumb to the challenging market conditions under which they began their operations (by early November, 12 CO-OPs had failed).
Health Republic of NY had about 87,000 effectuated individual enrollments – roughly 20 percent of the individual market in the state. They also had about 79,000 members in the small group market. Initially, state regulators said that existing members could keep their plans until December 31. But on October 30, just two days prior to the start of open enrollment, the NY Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) and NY State of Health announced that the financial situation at Health Republic of NY is worse than had previously been reported. As a result, existing policies were terminated at the end of November, and enrollees had to secure new coverage for December, in addition to selecting coverage for 2016.
New York established a hotline to assist Health Republic’s members with the transition to a new carrier: 1-855-329-8899.
In the individual market, enrollees were initially told they would need to select their new plan by November 15 in order to have a smooth transition to a new plan for December 1. Several of us pointed out that technically, enrollees can choose to use a special enrollment period triggered by a qualifying event – loss of coverage – and would be able to enroll up until November 30 and get a December 1 effective date. Nonetheless, NY State of Health and the Department of Financial Services were pushing the November 15 enrollment date, most likely to avoid the confusion that would arise if thousands of enrollees were trying to navigate a special enrollment period that happened concurrently with general open enrollment.
CO-OP members had until Nov 30 to select new plan
But on November 8, New York regulators announced that Health Republic members would have until November 30 to select new coverage for December, and also announced that members who failed to select a new plan for December would be automatically enrolled in a replacement plan. NYDFS said that the automatic enrollment would be to the plan that provided the closest level of benefits to the Health Republic plan the member was on, but provider networks could vary significantly.
On November 13, NY State of Health announced that Fidelis, Excellus, and MVP had agreed to accept auto-renewals of Health Republic members who hadn’t selected a new plan by the third week of November. The members were assigned to one of the three replacement carriers based on their county of residence. The three carriers had also agreed to credit Health Republic members for any out-of-pocket costs incurred during the first 11 months of the year. Health Republic members were advised to keep their insurance records from this year so that they can prove to their new carrier how much their out-of-pocket costs have been for 2015.
Health Republic members who didn’t want to enroll in new coverage for December were able to opt out of the automatic re-enrollment. There was some risk of adverse selection for the remaining carriers in NY, since it’s likely that some of Health Republic’s more healthy enrollees opted to be uninsured in December (there’s no penalty for a one-month gap in coverage), whereas virtually all of the sicker members likely switched (either actively or via the auto-enrollment process) to new plans for December.
Health Republic was the only insurer in NY State of Health that included Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in its network, and there are no exchange plans in 2016 that include the MSK in their networks.
In the small group market, NYDFS said that employers “should act as soon as possible to choose a new policy from another insurer for its employees to ensure continuity of coverage after November 30, 2015.” Individual plans typically run on a calendar-year basis, but small group plans typically have a plan year that begins on their effective date and runs for a year. 35 percent of the small businesses enrolled through NY State of Health’s SHOP exchange had coverage with Health Republic.
Health Republic members enroll twice
For members who transitioned to new plans for December, there was likely a premium increase. Health Republic was priced far lower than most other carriers offering plans through NY State of Health in 2015. A navigator in Rochester explained that “Health Republic came in at the lowest price in each of the medal (sic) levels, almost by half. It is going to be a challenge for (consumers) to pick a new plan in an insurance program that is going to be more expensive.” But those low premiums were ultimately the cause of the carrier’s demise; premiums simply weren’t high enough to cover claims.
Health Republic members essentially needed to shop around twice. They needed to find the best plan to meet their needs for December, which was priced with 2015’s rates. But then they also needed to make sure that they found the best plan to meet their needs and budget starting in January (the deadline to do so was extended to December 19); those plans are priced with 2016’s rates. The rate on the plan they selected for December was only valid for one month. If they chose to keep that same plan in January, the rate changed for the new year.
All consumers – Health Republic members as well as the rest of the population insured under individual plans – had to make their 2016 plan selections by December 19 in order to have their plan of choice in effect January 1.
Doctors, hospitals, and brokers left holding the bag
As a result of Health Republic’s collapse, medical providers and brokers in New York are owed millions of dollars, with no assurance that they’ll ever receive the outstanding funds. Some doctors have reported reimbursement checks that have bounced, and others simply haven’t received checks at all – in some cases, since the middle of last summer. A state law prohibits health providers from billing patients directly in an effort to collect unpaid Health Republic claims.
But the state of New York is expected to have more than a billion in surplus funds in its budget in 2016. The state Association of Health Underwriters has requested that lawmakers and Governor Cuomo use part of the budget surplus to cover some of Health Republic’s unpaid obligations to medical providers and brokers.
NYDFS has launched an investigation into Health Republic’s “inaccurate financial reporting,” and a Crain’s New York Business report published in April 2016 indicates that Health Republic’s plans were significantly underpriced and that Health Republic was on “unsteady ground” from its inception in 2012.
Comprehensive enrollment report – 2015
On July 29, NY State of Health published a comprehensive enrollment analysis that sums up a wide range of data for 2015 enrollments, including the on-exchange market share of all the carriers that offer plans through NY State of Health. The report released by NY State of Health includes a wealth of information about their enrollment progress. Some highlights:
- Navigators, CACs, and brokers enrolled two-thirds of the 2015 enrollees, while the other third enrolled on their own via the website, or enrolled over the phone using the call center. The exchange has a total of 11,388 Navigators, CACs, and brokers.
- Of the 16 carrier that offer individual exchange plans in 2015, six have expanded into additional counties this year, compared with 2014.
- 86 percent of the people who had QHPs through NY State of Health in 2014 renewed their coverage for 2015 (some selected a different plan, but they maintained coverage through the exchange).
- 54 percent of subsidized enrollees (not necessarily all effectuated however) have incomes at or below 200 percent of poverty level. Roughly 70 percent of effectuated enrollees are receiving subsidies, so about 38 percent of all QHP enrollees have incomes between 138 percent and 200 percent of poverty (those up to 138 percent are eligible for expanded Medicaid in New York). Those enrollees will be eligible for BHP coverage in 2016.
- 56 percent of the exchange’s enrollees live in New York City.
- In 2014, the top four insurers in NY State of Health had 65 percent of the market share. In 2015, that dropped to 59 percent, indicating improved market competition.
- 58 percent of enrollees selected silver plans, 18 percent selected bronze, 10 percent selected gold, 12 percent selected platinum, and 2 percent chose catastrophic plans. Cost sharing subsidies are only available on silver plans (for enrollees with income up to 250 percent of the poverty level), and 45 percent of QHP enrollees are receiving cost-sharing subsidies.
- 11 carriers offer stand-alone dental plans through NY State of Health. Healthplex Insurance Company enrolled 28 percent of the stand-alone dental applicants.
- As of early April, 3,708 small businesses were offering insurance to their employees through NY State of Health’s small business marketplace; ten insurers offer plans through the small business marketplace.
- In the small business marketplace, platinum plans are the most popular, followed by gold, then silver, then bronze (employers pay a portion of the premium, and there’s no incentive to select silver plans the way there is in the individual market, since cost-sharing subsidies are not part of the small business marketplace).
Individual market enrollment in NY up 89%
In April, the Kaiser Family Foundation released a report on overall individual market growth from 2013 to 2014, based on enrollment data at the end of each year. The study looked at the entire individual market, including exchange plans, off-exchange plans, and grandmothered/grandfathered plans, and did not differentiate in terms of what percentage of the market growth could be attributed to exchange enrollment.
In New York, the individual market grew by 89 percent in 2014 – the fourth-highest percentage growth increase in the country. And KFF notes that three carriers in NY – Affinity, MetroPlus, and Fidelis Care – did not submit data for the survey, so it’s likely that the individual market growth is actually higher than 89 percent (according to NY State of Health, those three carriers accounted for 32 percent of the exchange’s QHP enrollments in 2015). Nationwide, individual market growth was 46 percent.
2015 enrollment progress
By the end of open enrollment on February 15, NY State of Health announced that their total enrollment, including private plans and Medicaid/CHIP, had exceeded 2.1 million people, and that 88 percent of them had been uninsured prior to obtaining coverage through the exchange.
564,315 of those enrollees selected private plans (although the private plan enrollment total includes 156,827 Child Health Plus enrollees; the remaining 407,488 enrollees have QHPs). By February 21, HHS reported that NY State of Health’s private plan enrollment (not counting CHP) stood at 408,841, and that 35 percent of those enrollees are new to the exchange for 2015. Total Medicaid enrollment through the exchange stood at 1,545,319 people as of February 15.
Some QHP enrollees didn’t pay their initial premiums, and others opted to cancel their coverage early in the year. As of the end of March, NY State of Health had 361,340 people with coverage in effectuated QHPs. Unlike most states – where effectuated enrollment continued to decline in the second quarter of 205 – New York State of Health’s effectuated enrollment climbed, reaching 370,058 by the end of June. About 71 percent are receiving premium subsidies, and about 47 percent are receiving cost-sharing subsidies. Both of those numbers should decrease in 2016, once the BHP is introduced, as it will provide coverage for a significant number of lower-income residents who are currently enrolled in QHPs with premium subsidies and cost-sharing subsidies.
The majority of the current enrollees obtained coverage through the exchange in 2014 and renewed it for this year. But 552,993 enrollees are new to the exchange for 2015. Of those, about a third are enrolled in private plans (including Child Health Plus), and the rest are enrolled in New York’s expanded Medicaid program.
At the start of the 2015 open enrollment period, NY State of Health executive director, Donna Frescatore, was predicting 350,000 new private plan enrollments for the exchange by February 15, 2015, in addition to retaining their 370,000 2014 enrollees.
That put their target at 720,000 total private plan enrollees by the end of the second open enrollment, and clearly they fell short of that goal. Officials now believe that by the end of 2016, there will be 615,000 people enrolled in private plans through the exchange (although far more than that will likely enroll over the course of three years, the individual health insurance market has always been volatile, and attrition is to be expected as time goes by).
In 2015, NY State of Health added a feature to their website that allows users to browse plans, including estimated premium subsidies, by entering some very basic information about their age, location, and income. During the first open enrollment period this wasn’t available – people had to enter identifying data in order to see prices that included subsidies. The improvement – similar to one that Healthcare.gov made for people in states with federally facilitated marketplaces – makes the website more user-friendly.
2015 rates and changing benchmark plans
Rates for 2015 were approved in New York in early September 2014. In the individual market (both on and off-exchange), the average approved rate increase was just 5.7 percent – a significant decrease from the 12.5 percent that carriers had originally filed with the state. This chart shows each carrier by market share, and hovering over a carrier’s segment of the chart allows you to see their approved rate increase for 2015.
But as of November 11, 2014, PricewaterhouseCooper’s weighted average rate increase across 21 carriers in New York was just half a percent for 2015, ranging from a decrease of 15.3 percent to an increase of 13 percent. Any way you look at it, rates in New York looked pretty good in 2015.
Within the exchange, the second-lowest cost Silver plan (the benchmark plan) in New York City averaged $365/month (pre-subsidy) for a 40 year-old enrollee in 2014. That increased to $372/month for 2015 – an average increase of just 1.8 percent. But that’s assuming that the applicant again selected the second-lowest-cost Silver plan in 2015, which often means switching plans.
The Upshot from the NY Times released a map that showed each state broken into rating areas and the average price changes that enrollees in the 2014 benchmark plan could expect if they stayed with their plan from 2014, versus switching to the new benchmark plan for 2015. In some areas of New York, it made a dramatic difference in premium. Regardless of where you live, it’s always in your best interest to take a few minutes to shop around again before settling on a plan for the coming year.
Regulations, funding, and legislation
In late-April 2014, officials decided that carriers would not be required to cover out-of-network care in order to sell plans for 2015. This was a contentious issue during the first open enrollment, as none of the 16 carriers offering plans in the NY exchange cover out-of-network care unless it’s an emergency. Consumer advocates had pushed to require plans to cover out-of-network care, citing the narrow networks as a barrier to care for some residents. But insurers pushed back, noting that plans would be more expensive if they covered services provided outside of the established networks – ultimately, the exchange agreed.
State-run exchanges across the country have scrambled to secure funding going forward, as all exchanges were required to be financially self-sustaining starting in 2015. New York State of Health was planning to rely solely on state funds to pay for the exchange in 2015 (as opposed to user fees).
But in early February 2015, Governor Andrew Cuomo unveiled his 2015-2016 executive budget, which included a new tax on health insurance premiums (roughly $25 per person) for private plans sold on and off the exchange. The tax was projected to raise about $69 million, but health insurance carriers were opposed to the tax, as they say it will make health insurance less affordable for NY residents. Ultimately, lawmakers rejected the tax, and it is not included in the budget.
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo included the ACA’s Basic Health Program in his budget proposal released in late January 2014. As noted above, the BHP will be available for people with incomes between 138 percent and 200 percent of poverty starting in 2016. Although provisions for the BHP were included in the ACA, only a handful of states have thus far expressed interested in pursuing the BHP as a way to provide health insurance for low income residents who don’t qualify for Medicaid. That NY is among them is no surprise, given how dedicated the state has been to implementing and supporting the ACA.
Given the success of the exchange, officials in New York declined President Obama’s offer to allow health insurance plans scheduled for year-end termination to be extended into 2014. Roughly 100,000 NY residents received cancellation notices, but that figure is dwarfed by the number of people who enrolled in exchange plans with January 2014 effective dates, so it’s likely that most of the cancelled plans were replaced with new ACA-compliant plans.
New York State of Health has been one of the most successful exchanges in the country. As of April 15, 2014, 370,604 New Yorkers had enrolled in private health plans through NY State of Health, and another 590,158 had enrolled in Medicaid or CHIP, bringing total enrollment to 960,762.
Of the people who selected private plans, 74 percent received subsidies – lower than the national average of 85 percent. New York’s enrollment included a slightly higher percentage of “young invincibles” (people between the ages of 18 and 34), at 31 percent , than the national average of 28 percent.
2014 enrollment data is available based on zip codes (impressive considering the state has 2,200 zip codes!) in an interactive map created in November by Capital New York. And it’s broken down into QHP, Medicaid and CHIP totals to give a very accurate picture of where the exchange has had the most impact.
Among the 2014 enrollees, more than 80 percent were uninsured prior to enrolling in coverage. According to Gallup data, the uninsured rate in New York was 12.6 percent in 2013, and had fallen to 8.3 percent by the first half of 2015.
NY State of Health History
New York launched its consumer-facing website for its health insurance marketplace, NY State of Mind, on Aug. 20, 2013. The website included FAQs, an interactive map showing which health plans were available by county, and a calculator to help consumers learn if they are eligible for tax credits and how much they would pay for health insurance.
NY State of Health was working well early in October 2013, at a time when HealthCare.gov and many of the state-run exchanges were still struggling. And just before the second open enrollment began, the New York State Health Association released the results of a survey that found 92 percent of the 2014 NY State of Health enrollees were satisfied with their coverage, and three-quarters of the exchange’s enrollees would recommend NY State of Health to other people.
Gov. Cuomo established New York’s marketplace, or health insurance exchange, through an executive order. Cuomo issued the order in April 2012 after New York’s legislature failed to approve an exchange law in both the 2011 and 2012 sessions.
Cuomo cited numerous reasons in his executive order for starting an exchange. According to the governor’s office, state and local governments were paying more than $600 million every year to cover the health care costs of uninsured individuals. Uninsured individuals, the order read, “frequently forego preventive care and other needed treatment, putting them at risk of being sicker throughout their lives and dying sooner than those who have health insurance, which diverts funds from other public uses …”
New York enacted ACA-style reforms in the individual market two decades ago; policies there have been guaranteed issue and community rated ever since. This meant that premiums in New York were far higher than in other states where medical underwriting was utilized. There was no individual mandate, and few insurers participated in the pre-ACA individual market in New York.
The ACA’s individual mandate has increased the number of carriers offering policies in New York, and premiums in 2014 and 2015 were more than 50% lower than they were in 2013, and that continued to be the case in 2016. Combined with the ACA’s premium subsidies, these changes make individual health insurance far more affordable in New York than it used to be.
Carriers are also allowed to offer plans outside the exchange in NY, but they are required to offer the same policies in the exchange that they offer outside the exchange, which means there aren’t many reasons for consumers to shop off-exchange in NY.
About 2.7 million people in New York — about 16 percent of the population — did not have health insurance in 2013, according to the Urban Institute. About 1.1 million are expected to eventually buy insurance through the new marketplace.
Contact the New York exchange
NY State of Health
More New York health insurance exchange links
State Exchange Profile: New York
The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation overview of New York’s progress toward creating a state health insurance exchange.
Health Care For All New York (HCFANY),