Rationing – actually the threat of rationing – is one of the most powerful arguments leveled against proposals for an expanded government control of the U.S. health care system. Critics of such expanded control – which might take the form of a public plan or public option – argue that in order to control costs in a revamped system, the government would have to restrict (or ration) care, by refusing to pay for certain procedures or medication or by putting limits on care for the elderly or terminally ill. Some proponents of increased government control argue that health care is already, in effect, rationed in the United States, as consumers are limited in their ability to get adequate health insurance – and health care – by rapidly climbing health care costs.
Your state's health reform plans
Find out what your state's health insurance exchange will look like.
healthreformvotes.org
Did your members of Congress support or oppose health reform?
Individual health insuranceAdvice on buying medical insurance for you or your family.
How to buy health insurance10 tactics for choosing an affordable individual health plan
Cobra health insuranceExtend your employer's health coverage while they seeking new.
"Mr. and Mrs. Romney might ponder why so many people whose lives have been altered by chronic disease and disability become passionate supporters of health reform. Some of these advocates directly experience medical-economic hardship. Others have not faced the most punishing financial consequences." More...
Robert Greenstein, President of the Center on Budget Policy and Priorities (CBPP) dubbed Ryan's proposal "Robin Hood in reverse – on steroids. It could likely produce the largest redistribution of income from the bottom to the top in modern U.S. history." More...