Find a plan.

California health insurance marketplace guide 2023

Twelve insurers offer health plans through Covered California for 2023

California marketplace overview

California has a state-run exchange – Covered California. Twelve insurance carriers offer 2023 health insurance plans through the marketplace. This is the same as the number that participated for 2022, but there were some changes: Bright Health exited the market at the end of 2022 (in all states where they offered individual plans), while Aetna joined California’s marketplace for 2023.

Over 1.7 million people enrolled in private individual-market plans through the California exchange during open enrollment for 2023 coverage.

California created a state-funded subsidy program in 2020, using funding from the state’s individual mandate penalty. The state-funded subsidies were eliminated in 2021 when the American Rescue Plan’s federal subsidy enhancements made costs lower than they would have been with California’s state subsidies. But Democratic lawmakers in California’s Senate want to see the state-funded subsidies reinstated, in addition to the enhanced federal subsidies.

Frequently asked questions about California's ACA marketplace

There are 12 insurers offering individual/family health coverage through Covered California for 2023. That’s the same as 2022, but there were two notable changes: Aetna joined the exchange for 2023, while Bright Health stopped offering plans at the end of 2022. 

The following insurers offer plans in the California exchange for 2023, with plan availability varying from one location to another:

  • Aetna CVS Health (new for 2023)
  • Anthem Blue Cross of California (plans available statewide as of 2023)
  • Blue Shield of California (plans available statewide)
  • Chinese Community Health Plan
  • Health Net
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • L.A. Care Health Plan
  • Molina Healthcare
  • Oscar Health Plan of California
  • Sharp Health Plan
  • Valley Health Plan
  • Western Health Advantage

UnitedHealthcare exited the individual market in California at the end of 2016, as was the case in most of the states where they offered plans in 2016. By February 2016, UnitedHealthcare had about 1,400 enrollees in Covered California (less than a third of a percent of the exchange’s total QHP enrollment).

UnitedHealthcare and Oscar were both new to the exchange for 2016. United Healthcare applied in January 2015 to join Covered California state-wide, but the exchange initially rejected the proposal, citing a rule that requires carriers to wait at least three years to enter the marketplace if they didn’t offer plans for sale starting in 2014. In February 2015, the exchange issued a compromise, allowing United Healthcare the opportunity to sell plans in five of the state’s 19 regions where fewer than three carriers offer coverage. United’s participation was short-lived, however, as they left after just one year.

Open enrollment in California runs from November 1 to January 31, giving residents three full months to enroll in coverage each year.

And the exchange allows people to begin renewing their coverage each year on October 1, ahead of the open enrollment window.

It’s also noteworthy that California enacted legislation in 2022 (S.B.1473) that extends the deadline to get a January 1 effective date. It used to be December 15 (although the state generally extended that a bit each year), but now it’s December 31. So enrollments completed between November 1 and December 31 will have coverage effective January 1, while enrollments completed in the month of January will have coverage effective February 1.

Under the terms of A.B.156, enacted in 2017, California used to have an October 15 to January 15 enrollment window. But the state then enacted additional legislation (A.B.1309) in 2019, which keeps the three-month open enrollment window but aligns the start of open enrollment with the November 1 date that’s used in the rest of the country, and pushes out the end date until January 31.

Covered California is a state-run exchange, led by CEO Jessica Altman. The majority of U.S. states use the federally-run exchange ( but there are 18 fully state-run exchanges, and Covered California is among them.

(Virginia and Georgia plan to begin operating their own exchange platforms in the fall of 2023, bringing the number of fully state-run exchanges to 20.)

California was the first state to authorize a state-run exchange under the Affordable Care Act, with former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signing legislation in 2010 to create the exchange.

California’s exchange is widely considered one of the country’s most successful. As of March 2022, Jessica Altman, who previously served as Pennsylvania’s insurance commissioner, is Covered California’s CEO, replacing Peter Lee, who had been the CEO of Covered California since its inception.

Enrollment in California’s exchange is second only to Florida and Texas — with more than 1.7 million individual market enrollees as of early 2023. There were also more than 62,000 people enrolled in small group plans through Covered California’s SHOP platform as of late 2020.

Covered California has also enrolled millions of people in Medi-Cal (Medicaid) since the exchange began operating in 2013 (Medicaid enrollment fluctuates throughout the year, but California’s total enrollment in Medicaid and CHIP grew by nearly 6.4 million people from late 2013 to early 2023).

Not coincidentally, the state’s uninsured rate has dropped considerably: From 17.2% in 2013 to 7.2% in 2018, according to US Census data (although it increased to 7.7% in 2019).

California has been proactive in terms of enacting legislation to ensure that the individual market remains stable: California law banned the sale of short-term health insurance plans as of 2019, and prevents sole proprietors and partners from purchasing association health plans coverage instead of individual market plans.

And as of 2020, California implemented an individual mandate and began offering state-based premium subsidies for people earning up to 600% of the poverty level. These subsidies are no longer necessary, because the American Rescue Plan has enhanced federal premium subsidies, more than covering the portion that California had previously been covering. (The state does cover $1/month in premiums for all Covered California enrollees, ensuring that some people can access $0 premium plans.)

However, Democratic lawmakers in the California Senate are urging Gov. Newsom to use the individual mandate penalty money to reinstate state-funded subsidies on top of the enhanced federal subsidies, as several other states do (the alternative is to funnel the money into California’s general fund, which the lawmakers oppose because they prefer that it be used to make health coverage and care more affordable).

Covered California is one of ten state-run exchanges that uses an “active purchaser” model, meaning that they negotiate directly with carriers to make sure that rates, networks, and benefits are as consumer-friendly as possible (the remaining state-run exchanges and the federally-run exchange simply set minimum standards that carriers must meet, and then allow the sale of any plans that meet those guidelines; that’s known as a clearinghouse model as opposed to an active purchaser model).

Covered California is also the only exchange in the country that requires all health plans to be standardized, which means that within a single metal level, all plans have the same benefits (with the exception of HSA-qualified plans, which are also standardized but with benefits that are different from the other bronze and silver plans; Covered California’s board approves changes to the standardized HSA-qualified benefit design, as needed to comply with IRS regulations pertaining to HSA-qualified plans).

Covered California announced in July 2022 that the preliminary individual market rate changes for 2023 amounted to an increase of 6%. But the following month, after the Inflation Reduction Act was signed into law by President Biden, Covered California noted that the new law would drive rates slightly lower for 2023, resulting in an overall average rate increase of 5.6%

The rate changes for 2023 were higher than the rate changes had been for the past few years, but the average rate increase across the last four years is still only a little more than 2%, indicating significant stability in the state’s individual insurance market.

Bright Health exited California’s market for 2023, but Aetna CVS joined, keeping the exchange stable at a dozen participating insurers offering individual/family plans.

According to, the average rate changes vary from an increase of about 2% to an increase of about 13%, depending on the insurer. But that was before the Inflation Reduction Act resulted in some modest revisions, pushing the overall average rate increase slightly lower.

As is always the case, weighted average rate increases don’t paint a full picture:

  • They only apply to full-price plans, and very few enrollees pay full price for their coverage (nearly 89% of Covered CA’s 2023 enrollees were receiving premium subsidies). For people who are receiving subsidies, the net rate change from one year to the next will depend on how their specific plan’s rates are changing, as well as any changes in their premium subsidy amount (which depends on the cost of the benchmark plan, as well as the enrollee’s projected income for the coming year).
  • Overall average rate changes also don’t account for the fact that premiums increase with age, so people who maintain individual market coverage for several years will continue to pay more each year — just due to the fact that they’re getting older — even if their health plan technically has an overall rate change of 0% during that time.
  • A weighted average, by definition, lumps all the plans together. But different insurers offer plans in each region, and each insurer’s rate change is different. So the specific rate change that applies to a given enrollee can vary quite a bit from the average.

For perspective, here’s a look at how overall average premiums have changed in California’s marketplace over the last several years:

2015: Increase of 4.2%.

2016: Increase of 4%. The exchange noted that consumers who shopped around during open enrollment would have the opportunity to lower their premiums by an average of 4.5 percent, and as much as ten percent in some areas of the state.

2017: Increase of 13.2%. This was more than triple the average rate increases in 2015 and 2016, but it was also considerably lower than the average rate increases that were implemented in many other states for 2017.

2018: Increase of 12.5% plus an additional 12.4% for silver plans. California’s Insurance Commissioner announced on April 28 that insurers in California could file two sets of rates for 2018 plans: “ACA rates” and “Trump rates,” with the latter based on the higher premiums that would be necessary if the Trump administration continued to sabotage the ACA. As of August 2017, the weighted average rate increase across all 11 CoveredCA insurers was 12.5%. But that was based on the assumption that cost-sharing reduction (CSR) funding would continue to be provided by the federal government. Ultimately, Covered California decided to implement the CSR surcharge (ie, a larger rate increase for silver plans) on October 11, the day before the Trump administration announced that CSR funding would indeed end immediately. The average surcharge on silver plans was an additional 12.4%, on top of the rate increase that would have applied otherwise (details below about Covered California’s approach to CSR funding).

2019: Increase of 8.7%. The weighted average rate increase for 2019 was 8.7%, but the exchange noted that it would only have been about 5% without the elimination of the individual mandate penalty at the end of 2018 (California implemented its own individual mandate and penalty as of 2020).

2020: Increase of 0.9%: Insurers in California’s individual market finalized a weighted average rate increase of 0.9%, which was the lowest the state has seen since ACA-compliant plans became available in 2014 (the average increase for 2021 ended up being even lower, as noted above).

2021: Increase of 0.6%: Covered California’s individual market insurers proposed an overall average rate increase of 0.6% for 2021, and the rates were approved essentially as-filed. This amounted to a record-low rate increase for Covered California plans. And two of the insurers — Oscar and Anthem Blue Cross — expanded their coverage areas for 2021. Eleven insurers offer plans through Covered California in 2021. Six of the insurers implemented average rate decreases that ranged from 0.5% to 4.6%, and five insurers implemented average rate increases that ranged from 1% to 9%.

2022: Increase of 1.8%. Covered California announced in July 2021 that the preliminary individual market rate changes for 2022 amounted to a 1.8% increase. 

2023: 1,739,368 people enrolled in private plans through Covered California during the open enrollment period for 2023 coverage. This was slightly lower than the year before, which was not uncommon for state-run exchanges in 2023 (nationwide, enrollment hit a record high, driven primarily by enrollment growth in states that use

2022: 1,777,442 people enrolled in private plans through Covered California during the open enrollment period for 2022 coverage. This was a record high, and a 9% increase from the year before.

20211.625,546 people enrolled in private plans during the open enrollment period for 2021 coverage.

20201,538,819 people enrolled in private plans through Covered California during open enrollment for 2020 coverage. This was a slight increase from the year before, after three straight years of year-over-year enrollment declines. California’s new individual mandate and state-funded premium subsidies are a big part of the reason enrollment increased (combined with a very modest rate increase, which was partly due to the state’s new individual mandate).

20191,513,883 people enrolled in private plans through Covered California during open enrollment for 2019 coverage. Covered California noted that although enrollment was very similar to the prior year, there was a considerable drop in new enrollments. This coincided with the elimination of the federal individual mandate penalty at the end of 2018, and the exchange reiterated the need to establish an individual mandate in California. Lawmakers did just that in the 2019 session, and the state’s new mandate took effect in January 2020.

20181,521,524 people enrolled in private plans through Covered California during open enrollment for 2018 coverage. Total enrollment, including renewals, was slightly lower than it had been in 2017, but the lower enrollment volume may have been due to the state’s approach to handling the Trump administration’s decision to end federal funding for cost-sharing reductions (CSR). California led the way in encouraging non-subsidy-eligible enrollees who preferred silver-level plans to shop outside the exchange in order to avoid having the cost of CSR incorporated into their premiums.

20171,556,676 people enrolled in private plans through Covered California during open enrollment for 2017 coverage.

20161,575,340 people enrolled in private plans through Covered California during open enrollment for 2016 coverage.

20151,412,200 people enrolled in private plans through Covered California during open enrollment for 2015 coverage.

20141,405,102 people enrolled in private plans through Covered California during open enrollment for 2014 coverage.

Would ACA subsidies lower your health insurance premiums?

Use our 2023 subsidy calculator to see if you’re eligible for ACA premium subsidies – and your potential savings if you qualify.

Obamacare subsidy calculator *




Add ages of other family members to be insured.


Include yourself, your spouse, and children claimed as dependents on your taxes.


Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI)

For most taxpayers, your MAGI is close to AGI (Line 11 of your Form 1040 in 2021 and 2022).

Estimated annual subsidy

Provide information above to get an estimate.

* This tool provides ACA premium subsidy estimates based on your household income. does not collect or store any personal information from individuals using our subsidy calculator.

"Easy enrollment" legislation enacted in 2022; takes effect for 2023 tax year

After Maryland created an “easy enrollment” program that debuted in 2020, several other states have followed suit or are in the process of doing so. The idea is to let residents indicate on their state tax returns whether they are interested in learning more about low-cost or no-cost health coverage options that might be available to them.

The tax filer can simply check a box on their state tax return, and their applicable data are then shared with the state’s health insurance exchange. The exchange can then make a preliminary determination about whether the person (and their spouse and dependents, if applicable) may be eligible for Medicaid, CHIP, or premium tax credits in the marketplace.

In 2022, California enacted SB967, which creates an easy enrollment program in California as of the 2023 tax year (ie, for tax returns filed in early 2024).

Unlike most of the other states that have created or considered similar programs, the California legislation does not specifically create a special enrollment period for people who are deemed eligible for marketplace coverage (as opposed to Medicaid/CHIP, which is available year-round). But  Covered California will presumably create a special enrollment period for this purpose, as eligible enrollees would otherwise have to wait until the annual open enrollment period to obtain coverage.

New law will allow some California residents to add parents to their health plan as dependents

California A.B.570, enacted in October 2021, makes California the first state in the country to provide a pathway for some policyholders to add their parents to their health plan as dependents.

The legislation, which took effect in 2023, only applies to individual/family health plans (ie, not to plans that people get from an employer). Under the new law, a California resident with individual/family health coverage is allowed to cover parents as dependents, as long as the parents rely on the policyholder for at least 50% of their living expenses.

An earlier version of the bill would have applied to employer-sponsored health plans as well, but was opposed by business groups that worried about the cost. With the modification to make the legislation apply only to individual/family plans, the state expects that only about 15,000 people will use the option to add parents to their health plan.

State-funded premium subsidies debuted in 2020, but they're no longer needed as a result of the ARP. But $1/month in premiums is paid by the state on behalf of each enrollee

California enacted legislation in 2019 to create a temporary state-based premium subsidy for Covered California enrollees with household income up to 600% of the poverty level (for a family of four enrolling in a plan for 2020, that amounted to a household income of up to $154,500).

As described below, that program provided financial assistance to many enrollees in 2020. But it was suspended in 2021 when the American Rescue Plan’s enhanced federal subsidies began to bring net premiums well below the level they would have been with the previous federal + state subsidies. That will continue to be the case through at least 2025, under the federal Inflation Reduction Act. 

But Democratic Senators in California are concerned that the state’s individual mandate penalty revenue (assessed on people who don’t maintain health coverage) is being sent to the general fund, instead of being used to make health coverage and care more affordable. They are pushing to reinstate the state-funded subsidies in addition to the enhanced federal subsidies, as several other states do. As described below, lawmakers in California passed legislation in 2022 that would have created state-funded cost-sharing reductions, but Gov. Newsome vetoed it.

California’s 2019 budget bill (A.B.74) included an appropriation of $295 million to cover the cost of the subsidy program, with 75% of that money allocated for enrollees who don’t get any federal subsidies (ie, those with income between 400% and 600% of the poverty level, who were not eligible for federal subsidies prior to the American Rescue Plan) and 25% allocated for enrollees who earn between 200 and 400% of the poverty level (ie, they were already eligible for federal premium subsidies, but California would provide supplemental subsidies; according to a Covered California press release, small subsidies were also available to some households with income below 138% of the poverty level; these are individuals who aren’t eligible for Medicaid due to immigration status, which means they haven’t been in the US for at least five years).

The state-based premium subsidies were also addressed in S.B.78, which clarified that the subsidies would not be available after 2022.

Covered California reported that 486,000 had already enrolled in plans with financial assistance under the new state-based premium subsidies as of December 12, 2019 (for 2020 coverage). The exchange estimated that a total of 922,000 people would be eligible for the state-based premium subsidies. In February 2020, Covered California reported that about 47% of applicants with income between 400 and 600% of the poverty level had qualified for the state-funded subsidy, and the average subsidy amount for those households, covering 32,000 consumers, was $504 per household per month.

The exchange had previously estimated that up to 663,000 people with income between 200 and 400% of the poverty level would qualify for an average of $12/month in premium subsidies from the state of California, in addition to the subsidies they get from the federal government. Another 23,000 low-income California residents (whose income would actually make them eligible for Medi-Cal (Medicaid), but they aren’t eligible because they haven’t been in the US for at least five years) were projected to be eligible for an average of $1/month in additional subsidies from the state of California, on top of the substantial federal premium subsidies available to these enrollees.

But as of 2021 — and through at least 2025 — the state-based premium subsidies are no longer available. As noted above, that’s because the American Rescue Plan’s enhanced federal subsidies reduced net premiums below where they would have been with pre-ARP federal subsidies + state subsidies (the ARP subsidy enhancements were initially only available through 2022, but the Inflation Reduction Act extended them through 2025). So although California residents are no longer receiving state-based subsidies, they are receiving additional federal subsidies that more than make up the difference. The result is after-subsidy premiums that are lower than they were before the American Rescue Plan was enacted, even though the state-funded subsidies are no longer applicable. 

Legislation (SB944) was considered in California in 2022 in an effort to use state funding to reduce out-of-pocket costs for Covered California enrollees, since the state funding was no longer being used for premium subsidies (it would have eliminated deductibles on silver plans for enrollees with income up to 600% of the poverty level). The legislature passed this bill, but Governor Newsom vetoed it, noting that his preference is to hold onto the money so that it can be used to once again provide state-funded subsidies starting in 2026, if the American Rescue Plan subsidies are allowed to sunset at the end of 2025.  

However, California does cover $1 per month in premium costs for everyone enrolled in Covered California plans, as a result of 2021’s AB133. Federal premium subsidies cannot be used to cover non-essential health benefits, which can include things like abortion services and adult dental/vision services. If an exchange plan covers abortion, federal rules require that at least $1 per month in premiums not be covered by premium subsidies, even if the premium subsidy would otherwise cover the entire cost of the plan. All plans in California are required to cover abortion, which meant that everyone paid at least $1 per month for their coverage, and there were no $0 premium plans available. AB133 addressed this, starting in 2022. The $1 per month in state subsidies means that lower-income enrollees qualify for $0 premium plans now in California, just as they do in most other states.

But other than the $1/month benefit, Covered California is not currently offering any other premium or cost-sharing assistance beyond what the federal rules provide.

California created an individual mandate that took effect in 2020

California also enacted S.B.104 and S.B.78 in 2019, in order to create an individual mandate in California starting in 2020. The penalty for non-compliance will be based on the federal individual mandate penalty that applied in 2018 (ie, $695 per uninsured adult, or 2.5 percent of household income), but exemptions and maximum penalties will be California-specific. For example, the state notes that because California’s tax-filing threshold is higher than the IRS filing threshold, 115,000 fewer people will have to pay California’s individual mandate penalty, compared with the number of people who would have had to pay the federal penalty if it had remained in effect.

As a result of the state-based premium subsidies and individual mandate, California estimated that 229,000 additional people would obtain coverage in 2020. And the restored individual mandate penalty kept premiums 2 to 5 percent lower than they would otherwise have been, resulting in an overall average rate increase of less than 1 percent — the smallest the state has seen since ACA-compliant policies debuted in 2014.

Covered California’s enrollment total for 2020 ended up at 1.54 million for 2020, as opposed to 1.51 million in 2019. And after open enrollment ended, Covered California opened a special enrollment period through April 30 for people who didn’t know about the state’s new premium subsidies and/or the state’s new individual mandate.

The special enrollment period allowed people who were uninsured to enroll in a plan through Covered California, and it also allowed people with off-exchange coverage to transition to on-exchange coverage, in order to take advantage of the state-funded premium subsidies (and federal ACA subsidies, if applicable). This was important, as Covered California estimated that there are 280,000 people with off-exchange coverage — who had at least initially kept that coverage for 2020 — who would be eligible for premium subsidies (from the state and/or federal government) if they switched to an on-exchange plan.

The exchange’s fact sheet about the special enrollment period notes that they were “working with issuers and regulators on a plan to allow the
transfer of deductibles accumulated off-exchange to an on-Exchange health plan.” This is a crucial aspect of allowing a seamless transition to an on-exchange plan, for people who were previously insured off-exchange. (Normally, transitioning from off-exchange to on-exchange (or vice versa) during a special enrollment period means that the person has to start over with a new deductible and out-of-pocket maximum, regardless of whether they’ve already incurred charges under their old plan during the first part of the year.)

People who enrolled in a Covered California plan during the special enrollment period had coverage effective the first of the month after they applied. California’s new individual mandate has an exemption available for people who only have one short gap in coverage that’s not more than three months long. So a person who was uninsured could enroll by March 31, have coverage effective April 1, and will not owe a penalty for being uninsured in 2020 as long as they maintain their coverage for the remainder of the year. But an uninsured person who enrolled in April would have had coverage effective May 1, which means they’d have a four-month gap in coverage (January through April). That will trigger a penalty (assessed on their 2020 tax return, filed in early 2021) equal to one-third of the annual penalty amount, assuming they maintain coverage for the final eight months of the year and aren’t otherwise exempt from the penalty.

2018 legislation: Short-term plans banned; AHPs not allowed for self-employed individuals

California enacted several pieces of legislation in 2018 addressing health care reform in California. They include:

  • S.B.910: Prohibits the sale of short-term health insurance plans as of January 1, 2019. The Trump Administration has rolled back the Obama Administration regulations that shortened the allowable duration of short-term plans. S.B.910 is an effort to protect the state’s major medical individual market, and prevent short-term plans from siphoning off the healthiest members into lower-cost plans.
  • S.B.1375: Prohibits sole proprietors and partners in a partnership (along with their spouses) from being considered “eligible employees” who can purchase small group health insurance. This means such individuals cannot purchase association health plan coverage, and must instead purchase coverage in the individual market if they wish to obtain health insurance. As with S.B.910, the point of this legislation is to protect the overall health of the risk pool for individual market coverage in California, so that the healthiest members cannot shift to association health plan coverage instead (as of mid-2019, association health plans can no longer market to sole proprietors in any states under the Trump administration rules that were rolled out in 2018, as a federal judge has invalidated the rule and an appeal is pending).
  • A.B.2499: Codifies medical loss ratio (MLR) requirements into California law. Existing regulations in the state simply required insurers to comply with the federal medical loss ratio rules. But A.B.2499 clarifies the specifics in California law, which will remain in place even if the federal MLR requirements are repealed in the future. Large group plans must spend at least 85 percent of premiums on medical claims and quality improvements, while individual and small group plans must spend at least 80 percent. An earlier version of the bill called for codifying more stringent MLR rules in California (90 percent for large group plans and 85 percent for individual and small group plans), but the version that was enacted simply mirrors the existing federal rules.
  • A.B.2472: This legislation requires the California Council on Health Care Delivery Systems to analyze “the feasibility of a public health insurance plan option to increase competition and choice for health care consumers” and submit a feasibility report to the legislature by October 2021. An earlier version of the bill would have allowed people who aren’t eligible for Medicaid to buy into the Medicaid program., essentially creating a public health insurance option in California that would operate alongside the private plans that are available for purchase (the state would have had to obtain a waiver from the federal government in order to implement a Medicaid buy-in program). The feasibility analysis could still end up recommending a Medicaid buy-in program but the current law only calls for an analysis and report, rather than moving forward with Medicaid buy-in.

California has its own de minimis range for metal level actuarial value

Under the ACA, all individual and small group plans (effective in 2014 or later) have to conform to one of four metal levels (in addition to catastrophic plans).

The metal level delineation is based on actuarial value (AV): Bronze plans cover 60% of average costs across a standard population, silver plans cover 70%, gold plans cover 80%, and platinum plans cover 90%. But because it’s difficult to hit that number exactly, an allowable de minimis range of +/-2% was incorporated in the requirements.

The market stabilization regulations that HHS finalized in April 2017 allowed the de minimis range to expand to +2/-4%, and that rule remained in place from 2018 through 2022. So during those years, a plan with an actuarial value of 66 to 72% was considered a silver plan.

But California has its own state law that allowed de minimis variation of only +/-2%, so the less stringent federal regulation did not take effect in California at that point; plans still had to comply with the existing rules (ie, silver plans had to have an actuarial value of 68 to 72%, for example).

In 2019, California enacted legislation (SB78) which, among many other provisions, provides more flexibility on the de minimus range for actuarial value. But instead of the approach that HHS took, of allowing insurers to err more on the low end of the actuarial value range, California did the opposite: SB78 allows plans to have a de minimus range of +4/-2%, which means that plans can have AV up to four points above the target number, but can still only go two points below it. So under California’s rules, a silver plan could have an AV of 68 to 74%.

It’s noteworthy that as of 2023, HHS has reversed course on the expanded de minimus rules, reverting to the +/-2 range that was used prior to 2018, and further tightening the rules for individual market Silver plans and cost-sharing reduction variants of Silver plans.

California withdrew proposal to allow undocumented immigrants to buy coverage through Covered California

SB10 was signed into law in California in June 2016. The law allows undocumented immigrants to purchase unsubsidized coverage in the exchange, but a waiver from HHS was necessary in order to move forward, since the ACA forbids undocumented immigrants from purchasing coverage in the exchanges.

California’s waiver proposal was complete as of January 17, 2017, which was the start of a 30-day public comment period. But on January 18, the state withdrew the waiver at the request of California State Senator Ricardo Lara (D, Bell Gardens), the senator who had introduced and championed SB10 (Lara is the senator who introduced S.B.562 in an effort to bring single-payer to California). Governor Jerry Brown agreed with Lara’s decision to withdraw the waiver proposal.

The state withdrew the proposal because they were concerned that the Trump administration might use information from the exchange to deport undocumented immigrants. Lara said that he didn’t “trust the Trump administration to do what’s best for California and to implement the waiver in a way that protects people’s privacy and health.” He called the withdrawal of the waiver “the first California casualty of the Trump presidency.”

Undocumented immigrants can already purchase full-price coverage outside the exchange. It’s not clear how much SB10 would have decreased the uninsured rate among undocumented immigrants if it had been implemented, since they would still have been required to pay full price for their coverage in the exchange.

It’s noteworthy that California began allowing undocumented children to enroll in Medi-Cal (paid for with state funds) as of 2016, and expanded this to young adults in 2020

Colorado has created a separate enrollment platform that undocumented immigrants can use as of the 2023 plan year, allowing them to receive new state-funded subsidies. But there are still no states where undocumented immigrants are allowed to use the ACA-created health insurance exchange, with or without subsidies. 

Covered California caps monthly prescription costs

The cost of high-end prescription drugs is a growing problem for healthcare cost sustainability, and the rising cost of prescriptions is cited repeatedly in justifications provided by insurers requesting double-digit rate increases. But the cost of specialty medications can also be an insurmountable burden for patients, even when they have health insurance. For high-end specialty medications, like Sovaldi, it’s not uncommon for patients to reach their maximum out-of-pocket exposure very quickly, paying thousands of dollars per month in coinsurance for their medications.

In May 2015, Covered California rolled out a cap on prescription costs that went into effect in 2016, along with various other benefit enhancements that allow consumers access to more care without having to meet steep deductibles. Because Covered California requires plan standardization on and off-exchange, the prescription copay cap is also available to many consumers purchasing plans outside the exchange. The cap is linked to the metal level of the plan purchased; for the majority of consumers, the cap is $250 per specialty medication per month, but it ranges from $150 to $500, with bronze plan enrollees having the highest specialty drug copay cap.

The California legislature also created a similar cap state-wide, to include non-grandfathered group and individual plans sold only outside Covered California. Assembly Bill 339 was signed into law in October 2015, and took effect January 1, 2017. It applies to all non-grandfathered individual and small group plans in the state, and limits the copayment for a 30-day supply of any medication to no more $250, until January 1, 2020. This was later extended through 2023 by 2018’s SB1021.

(For plans designated as high deductible policies, the copay limit applies after the deductible is met, in order to comply with IRS rules for HSA-qualified plans.)

Covered California fixed pregnancy glitch

For part of 2015 and 2016, a glitch in Covered California’s system had been automatically transferring privately-insured pregnant women to Medi-Cal if their income made them eligible for Medi-Cal while pregnant. Medi-Cal is available to all adults with income up to 138 percent of the poverty level, but for pregnant women, the income threshold extends up to 213 percent of the poverty level.

So a woman with income between 138 percent and 213 percent of the poverty level would be eligible for a subsidized qualified health plan (QHP) in the exchange if she’s not pregnant, but for Medi-Cal if she is pregnant. And a pregnant woman counts as two people for Medi-Cal eligibility determination, but just one person for QHP subsidy eligibility determination, further increasing the number of women whose eligibility status could change with a pregnancy.

Some women had been reporting their pregnancies to Covered California, and the exchange had been automatically switching them to Medi-Cal without confirming that the woman wanted to switch. This caused about 2,000 women to lose access to their healthcare providers because of network changes, and the exchange began working as quickly as possible to remedy the problem. By September 2016, the issue had been resolved, and pregnant women are now given a choice of remaining on their QHP or switching to Medi-Cal

Some women prefer to switch to Medi-Cal, since they save a considerable amount of money on premiums and out-of-pocket costs with Medi-Cal. But switching can mean having to choose a new doctor, which some women are uncomfortable doing mid-pregnancy.

California’s SHOP exchange

California’s Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) exchange lets small employers sign up and offer coverage to their employees year round. Five insurers are offering medical plans through the SHOP: Blue Shield of California, Chinese Community Health Plan, Health Net, Kaiser Permanente, and Sharp Health Plan.

The SHOP exchange in California has seen consistent growth, with 47,000 covered individuals as of 2018.

Small businesses must submit a completed application and the first month’s premium at least five business days before the end of the month to have coverage starting the first day of the following month. Employers determine the amount they’re willing to pay for health insurance, and employees can then select from among all the plan options available in the SHOP exchange; the employer gets one bill each month, but employees have a wide range of plan choices.

In 2015, Covered CA’s SHOP exchange was open to businesses with one to 50 employees. That changed in 2016 however, and businesses with up to 100 employees are now able to purchase coverage. That was supposed to be the case nationwide, but in October 2015, President Obama signed HR1624 into law, keeping the definition of “small group” at businesses with up to 50 employees (the ACA had called for expanding “small group” to include businesses with up to 100 employees starting in 2016).

States were still allowed to expand their definitions of small businesses, and California had already aligned their laws with the ACA. California is one of only four states to expand the definition of small group in 2016. California businesses with up to 100 employees fall under the category of small groups starting in 2016.

California health insurance exchange links

Covered California

California Health Benefit Exchange
Information about exchange planning and development

State Exchange Profile: California
The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation overview of California’s progress toward creating a state health insurance exchange.

Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for Her state health exchange updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts.

Other types of health coverage in California

Short-term health insurance is not sold in California, but more coverage options are waiting for you!

Medi-Cal is the largest Medicaid program in nation, covering more than 14 million Californians.

California's 'birthday rule' provides an annual opportunity for Medigap enrollees to change coverage.

Find affordable individual and family plans, small-group, short-term or Medicare plans.

Learn about programs that provide financial help to California Medicare enrollees – including Medicare Savings Programs and Medicaid.

Learn more about adult and pediatric dental insurance options in California, including stand-alone dental and coverage through Covered California.

Learn about health insurance coverage options in your state.

Our state guides offer up-to-date information about ACA-compliant individual and family plans and marketplace enrollment; Medicaid expansion status and Medicaid eligibility; short-term health insurance regulations and short-term plan availability; and Medicare plan options.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x