I’m a legal U.S. resident, but not a citizen. My job doesn’t offer health benefits. Can the ACA help me?

Q: I’m a legal resident in the United States, but not a citizen.  My job doesn’t offer health insurance, and I haven’t been able to afford individual coverage in the past.  Does the Affordable Care Act help me?

A: Yes, the ACA makes coverage available to you, and you may be eligible for financial help that can lower the cost of your coverage and the out-of-pocket costs you’ll face if you need medical care.

Coverage, with subsidies based on income, is available to lawfully-present US residents

Legal U.S. residents have the same eligibility as citizens to receive subsidies for health insurance purchased in the exchange. Since you don’t have an option for coverage through your employer, you may be eligible to receive a subsidy to help pay your premiums (on any metal-level plan) and reduce the out-of-pocket costs (Silver plan only) for your policy. Eligibility is based on your household income, and extends as high as 400 percent of federal poverty level.

Lawfully-present recent immigrants can get premium subsidies even with income below the poverty level

But the ACA also includes a provision to assist legal residents who have incomes below 100 percent of poverty level. Since most legal permanent residents are not eligible for Medicaid until they have been in the U.S. for five years, many lawfully present individuals would have found themselves in a situation where they earned too little (less than 100 percent of the federal poverty level) to qualify for exchange subsidies but were also not eligible for Medicaid – even in states that expanded Medicaid – based on the amount of time they had been in the United States.

So lawmakers included a provision in the ACA that allows legal aliens with household incomes under 100 percent of poverty level to receive exchange subsidies at the level they would if their income was equal to 100 percent of poverty level (see page 113).

Ironically, about 2.4 million Americans have ended up in the Medicaid coverage gap, in exactly the sort of scenario that lawmakers worked to prevent for lawfully-present recent immigrants. As the ACA was written, people with income up to 138 percent of the poverty level were to be eligible for Medicaid, and those with income above that level would be eligible for premium subsidies in the exchange instead (and premium subsidies aren’t available to people with income below the poverty level, unless they’re in the situation described above, for lawfully-present recent immigrants).

But two years after the ACA was enacted, the Supreme Court ruled that states could not be forced to expand Medicaid, and 19 states have not yet accepted federal funding to expand their Medicaid programs. In 18 of those states (all but Wisconsin), there’s a coverage gap: People with income below the poverty level aren’t eligible for premium subsidies, and they’re not eligible for Medicaid either, unless they meet the strict eligibility guidelines that the states impose.

Lawmakers created a special provision to allow for premium subsidies for recent immigrants with income below the poverty level, but they never imagined that Medicaid expansion would become optional and that nearly half the states would leave their poorest residents with no realistic options for health insurance. So there is no similar provision in the ACA to grant premium subsidies to impoverished Americans who aren’t eligible for Medicaid because their states won’t expand Medicaid.