Please provide your zip code to see plans in your area.
A TRUSTED INDEPENDENT HEALTH INSURANCE GUIDE SINCE 1994.
Virginia has a state-run exchange that uses the federally run enrollment platform – HealthCare.gov. Twelve insurers are offering individual/family plans for 2023 through the exchange, including two Aetna affiliates (Aetna has expanded to offer an HMO product — Aetna Health — in addition to the Aetna Life EPO product they already offered). But Bright Health is no longer offering plans in the individual family market after the end of 2022.
Virginia has a new reinsurance program as of 2023, which has resulted in double-digit rate decreases for the state’s full-price (pre-subsidy) individual/family health plans.
And Virginia also plans to be running its own health insurance exchange by the fall of 2023, in time for the open enrollment period for 2024 coverage.
During open enrollment for 2022 coverage, 307,946 Virginians enrolled in private individual market plans through the state exchange.
As of the 2023 plan year, Virginia has a state-run exchange that uses the federally run enrollment platform – HealthCare.gov. But Virginia will have its own enrollment platform in place by the time people are signing up for 2024 plans.
Virginia HB1428 and SB732, both signed into law in April 2020, call for Virginia to create a state-run health insurance exchange, overseen by the Virginia Bureau of Insurance and State Corporation Commission. The process of building the exchange is underway, and it will debut in the fall of 2023, for coverage effective in 2024.
The Virginia State Corporation Commission has a page on its website for the Virginia Health Benefit Exchange, which includes various details related to the creation of Virginia’s new fully state-run exchange. And they issued a comprehensive report in late 2021, detailing the work that had been done at that point
Maine, Kentucky, and New Mexico all transitioned to fully state-run exchanges in the fall of 2021, after previously having state-run exchanges that used the HealthCare.gov enrollment platform. Virginia will follow them as of the fall of 2023.
In the first several years of ACA implementation, rate proposals for the coming year were typically made available in May, as Virginia has one of the earliest rate filing deadlines in the country. That’s still the case — rate filings for 2023 plans were due on May 22, 2022 in Virginia — but the state now suppresses the data in SERFF (the filing system) until July 30, when the details are publicized by the federal government.
The Virginia State Corporation Commission/Bureau of Insurance held a teleconference in late March 2022, outlining rules and regulations for 2023 health coverage. Some notable points were mentioned:
Virginia has a state-run exchange that uses the federally-run enrollment platform. This means the state oversees the exchange, but applicants enroll via HealthCare.gov (prior to the 2021 plan year, Virginia relied fully on the federally-run exchange).
From a consumer’s standpoint, nothing has changed (yet) about Virginia’s exchange. Enrollments are still conducted through HealthCare.gov, just as they have been since the fall of 2013. But Virginia as described above, Virginia will have its own fully state-run exchange platform in place by late 2023, for enrollment in 2024 health plans. This is a result of 2020 state legislation (HB1428 and SB732), which directed the state to create its own health insurance exchange.
Virginia’s exchange will be funded with an assessment on insurers that won’t exceed 3% of premiums (for plans sold both on- and off-exchange). The fee for HealthCare.gov in 2023 is 2.75% of premiums, although it’s only 2.25% for state-run exchanges that use the federal enrollment platform. Since Virginia has transitioned to this model, the cost to use HealthCare.gov is lower than it would otherwise have been.
The open enrollment period for individual/family coverage runs rom November 1 through January 15. Outside of that window, a special enrollment period is necessary in order to enroll or make a change to your coverage.
Special enrollment periods are generally linked to a qualifying life event, although some special enrollment periods (such as the enrollment opportunity for Native Americans, or for people earning under 150% of the poverty level) do not require a specific life event.
Learn more about enrollment opportunities in our comprehensive guide to open enrollment and to special enrollment periods.
As of 2023, there are 12 insurers that offer health plans in Virginia’s exchange, including one newcomer (Aetna Health, which is an HMO affliate) and one exit (Bright Health is no longer offering individual/family plans in any state after the end of 2022).
2023 health plans are available in Virginia’s exchange from the following insurers, with coverage areas that vary by insurer:
For the fourth year in a row, average pre-subsidy premiums in Virginia’s individual market decreased for 2023. And the 2023 decrease was substantial, due to the state’s new reinsurance program.
Bright Health has left Virginia’s individual/family market after the end of 2022, but Aetna is offering HMO plans for 2022 (Aetna Health), in addition to EPO plans0 (Aetna Life), so there are still 12 insurers offering plans through Virginia’s exchange for 2023.
The insurers that offer individual market coverage through Virginia’s exchange made the following average rate changes for 2023:
So all of the returning insurers have implemented rate decreases for 2023, and most are double-digit decreases.
But overall average rate changes don’t tell the whole story:
Although average premiums decreased in Virginia for 2020, 2021, and 2022, that had certainly not been the case in previous years. Here’s a summary of how rates have changed over the years in Virginia’s individual market (note that all rate changes apply to full-price premiums; after subsidies are applied, the rate changes can be much different).
For all 14 carriers in the individual market in Virginia (including off-exchange plans), PricewaterhouseCooper data indicated a weighted average finalized premium increase of 10.2% for 2015.
But for people who had the benchmark Silver plan, price increases were more muted, mostly averaging 3% to 6% in much of the state, especially for enrollees willing to shop around in order to make sure they still had the second-lowest-cost Silver plan in 2015. The Virginia Association of Health Plans called the price increases “relatively modest” for people who were enrolled in an exchange plan in 2014 and then renewed their coverage or switched to another exchange plan for 2015.
Regulators in Virginia announced approved rate changes for 2016 in early October 2015. For carriers that offered individual plans in the Virginia exchange, rate changes for 2016 ranged from a 3.34% decrease (Innovation Health Insurance Co.) to a 19.1% increase (Group Hospitalization and Medical Services). For the entire individual market—which includes five carriers that only offer plans off-exchange (two of which had increases in excess of 14 percent)—the overall weighted average rate increase in Virginia was 8.5% for 2016.
There were ten insurers offering plans in the Virginia exchange for 2017. The weighted average rate increase across all of them was just over 18%. The average benchmark plan (second-lowest-cost silver plan) premium in Virginia was 10% more expensive in 2017 than it was in 2016 (that’s less than half the 22% nationwide average increase in benchmark plans that year).
Aetna offered all new plans for 2017, replacing Coventry’s 2016 plans. But Aetna subsequently exited the Virginia market altogether at the end of 2017. As noted above, Aetna has returned to Virginia’s marketplace for 2022.
CareFirst Blue Choice and GHMSI terminated all of their bronze plans at the end of 2016, and mapped bronze enrollees to silver plans instead.
For an analysis of the rate review process that took place in Virginia during the summer of 2016, ACAsignups has a comprehensive review of the initial rate filings in Virginia for 2017, an updated version that provides additional clarity, and a revised version with revisions as of August 2016.
When rates for 2018 were being set in the spring of 2017, insurers in Virginia initially assumed, for the most part, that funding for cost-sharing reductions (CSR) would continue in 2018. But they revised the rate filings later in the summer to reflect the new assumption that CSR funding would not continue, adding the cost of CSR to silver plan rates. Ultimately, the Trump administration announced in mid-October that CSR funding would end immediately, so it was wise planning on the part of insurers to have added the cost of CSR to their premiums for 2018 (insurers are still required to provide CSR benefits to all eligible enrollees, regardless of whether the insurer is being reimbursed for the costs).
The seven insurers that offered coverage in the Virginia exchange in 2018 increased their average premiums between 34% and 81% for 2018, with an average increase of 57.7%. Silver plans generally had the most significant rate increases, since the cost of CSR was added to their premiums.
Optima had the largest percentage increase of any of the insurers in Virginia for 2018, and in areas where they offered coverage along with one or more other insurers for 2017, Optima’s rates tended to be on the higher end of the spectrum in 2017 as well. It’s noteworthy that that Optima’s rates were so high that their medical loss ratio dropped to just 49 percent for 2018, resulting in huge refunds for consumers in 2019.
For people who get premium subsidies, the subsidies were much larger for 2018 than they were in 2017, to offset the enormous rate increase (the unsubsidized cost of the lowest-priced silver plan for a 40-year-old went from $303/month to $1012/month in the Charlottesville area), keeping the after-subsidy cost of the benchmark plan roughly equivalent to what it was in 2017 (slightly lower, actually, but roughly equivalent). But for people who don’t get premium subsidies, the rate increase in the Charlottesville area was the most substantial in the country.
The Virginia Bureau of Insurance posted a summary of average rate increases for 2019, with data as of August 22, 2018. The BOI also put together a very informative overview of the projected 2019 market and how it compared with previous years.
At ACA Signups, Charles Gaba calculated a weighted average rate increase of just under 10% in Virginia’s individual market for 2019. Premium changes for 2019 varied considerably from one insurer to another: There were some decreases, but GHMSI increased average premiums by 45 percent.
The insurers attributed a significant portion of the proposed 2019 rate increases to continued federal uncertainty and regulations that will destabilize the individual markets, including the expansion of short-term plans and association health plans, and the elimination of the individual mandate penalty after the end of 2018.
As was the case for 2018, Optima’s rate filing ended up being newsworthy for 2019. Optima’s initial rate filing, submitted in May 2018, called for an average rate decrease of 1.9%. They filed revised rates on August 9 (SERFF filing number OPHL-131486283) that called for an average rate decrease of 7.2% (this is what was ultimately approved by regulators and implemented). The deadline to revise rate filings was August 10, and Anthem’s revised filing on that date included plans to expand back into some of the areas where they had exited the year before, ending Optima’s monopoly in some areas. In response, Optima filed yet another set of revised rates on August 16, proposing an average rate decrease of 16.6% (see the revised filings under the same SERFF tracking number that applied to the first revised filings).
But the Virginia BOI rejected this additional filing, as it came after the August 10 deadline. Optima submitted a petition to the State Corporation Commission, asking that their post-deadline rate revision be considered. But a few days later, BOI responded, clarifying that Optima’s latest filing (submitted after the August 10 deadline) was not a response to any objections BOI had to their earlier filings, but was instead a revised filing based on a smaller projected profit margin for 2019, and filed only after Optima realized that they would no longer have a monopoly in 2019 (due to Anthem’s last-minute coverage area expansion). BOI’s response makes it clear that they had offered Optima an opportunity to lower their projected profit margin earlier in August, but the insurer chose not to do so when they believed that they would still have a monopoly in the Charlottesville area. Optima’s petition indicated that they were aware that without a monopoly, their proposed rates (a 7.2% average decrease, as opposed to the 16.6% decrease) would result in a significant reduction in enrollment and a loss of revenue. But BOI’s response essentially indicated that Optima must lie in the bed they made. In mid-September, the State Corporation Commission agreed with BOI, stating that “the decision not to submit its most competitive rates by the August 10th filing date was Optima’s, and Optima’s alone. Only after seeing a more competitive (and timely submitted) rate filing did Optima attempt to submit lower or more competitive rates after the filing date.”
Virginia Premier joined the exchange in the Richmond area (rating area 7) for 2019. Virginia Premier’s filing indicated that they expected about 4,000 people to purchase their plans for 2019, almost entirely via the exchange (Virginia Premier offered plans in the exchange in 2020 as well, but left at the end of that year).
Oscar Health entered the markets in six states for 2020, including Virginia (Oscar also expanded its existing coverage area in nine other states). Oscar’s plans became available in the Richmond area for 2020 — the same area where Virginia Premier entered the market in 2019. Five of the nine insurers in Virginia’s marketplace decreased their average premiums for 2020, and the overall average rate change across all the insurers amounted to a decrease of 5%.
Health Keepers and Cigna were projected to have roughly two-thirds of the state’s total market share in 2020. Optima Health Plan and Kaiser had another quarter. The other insurers together made up the remaining 7.5 percent of the market. So of the four insurers that hold nearly all of the market share, three reduced their premiums for 2020 (in Optima’s case, the reduction was more than 20 percent), and one implemented a very slight increase.
Benchmark plan premiums dropped by an average of 6 percent in Virginia for 2020, so premium subsidies (which are based on the cost of the benchmark plan) were also smaller than they were in 2019.
Optima Health Insurance Company is a separate entity that only offers plans (PPOs) outside the exchange in Virginia. The rates for those plans decreased by an average of 19.6% for 2020.
Virginia continued to have nine insurers offering individual market coverage in the exchange in 2021, but the specifics changed a bit: Optimum Choice entered Virginia’s marketplace for 2021, with plans available in the Washington, Arlington, Alexandria, and Winchester areas. And Virginia Premier, which offered plans in Virginia’s exchange in 2020, no longer offers any individual market plans (Virginia Premier has continued to offer Medicare and Medicaid plans).
In August 2020, the Virginia Bureau of Insurance published a summary of the rate changes that insurers had filed for 2021. Additional details are available in SERFF and on the federal government’s rate review page, which indicates that the rate filings the BOI published in August were ultimately approved by state and federal regulators.
Overall, the average rate change for 2021 amounted to a decrease of 3.7%.
2022: Average rate decrease of 3%
For the third year in a row, average pre-subsidy premiums in Virginia’s individual market decreased for 2022. The overall average rate decrease for 2022 was nearly 3%.
Virginia’s exchange also had three additional insurers offering plans for 2022. Aetna, Bright Health, and Innovation Health Plan joined the exchange, bringing the total number of exchange insurers to 12 — the highest it had ever been.
During the open enrollment period for 2022 coverage, 307,946 Virginia residents enrolled in private qualified health plans (QHPs) through the Virginia exchange/marketplace. This was the highest enrollment the state had seen since 2018.
Like most states that use HealthCare.gov, enrollment in Virginia’s exchange initially peaked in 2016 and began to decline after that. The decline was particularly significant in 2019, when Medicaid expansion took effect in Virginia. Prior to 2019, people with income between 100% and 138% of the poverty level were eligible for premium subsidies to purchase private plans in the exchange, whereas they became eligible for Medicaid instead as of 2019.
And although nationwide enrollment increased slightly in 2021, it declined again in Virginia, by more than 3%. That could be attributed to the still fairly new expansion of Medicaid, combined with the effects of the COVID pandemic and people transitioning onto Medicaid due to job/income losses. As noted above, enrollment in Virginia’s fairly new Medicaid expansion coverage has increased sharply during the pandemic, with more than 641,000 people enrolled as of March 2022.
But enrollment in Virginia’s exchange rebounded for 2022, due in large part to the enhanced subsidies available under the American Rescue Plan, the longer open enrollment period, and the additional federal funding for outreach and enrollment assistance.
Here’s a summary of enrollment in private individual market plans in Virginia’s exchange each year (these numbers represent the number of people who bought plans during open enrollment; the number fluctuates throughout the year as people drop their coverage and others enroll via special enrollment periods).
In March 2021, Virginia enacted legislation to create a reinsurance program. Virginia H.B.2332 called for the state to submit a 1332 waiver proposal to the federal government by January 1, 2022, seeking federal pass-through funding for the reinsurance program (reinsurance reduces overall premiums, and thus lowers premium subsidies as well; a 1332 waiver allows the state to recoup the savings and use it to fund the reinsurance program, as opposed to just letting the federal government keep the savings).
Virginia’s State Corporation Commission and Bureau of Insurance sorted out the specifics for the reinsurance program, and posted the waiver draft in early October. The final proposal was submitted to the federal government in December 2021. A public comment period ran from late January through the end of February (the comments that were submitted can be seen here).
The waiver proposal was still pending federal approval as of late March, when the Virginia State Corporation Commission/Bureau of Insurance held a teleconference with 2023 rate and plan filing information for insurers. The state instructed insurers to file their proposed rates without accounting for the reinsurance program. But it was noted that insurers would be able to revise their rate proposals if and when the waiver proposal was approved. The approval ultimately came in mid-May, around the time that the initial rate filings were due. The reinsurance program is expected to result in full-price premiums that are 15% lower than they would otherwise be, and potentially up to 20% lower. Indeed, virtually all of the state’s insurers filed double-digit rate decreases for 2023 once the reinsurance program had been finalized.
Reinsurance is primarily important as a tool to reduce premiums for people who do not qualify for premium subsidies in the marketplace. That isn’t as important through 2025, due to the American Rescue Plan‘s expansion of premium subsidies (specifically, the elimination of the “subsidy cliff”).
The Inflation Reduction Act ensures that the subsidy enhancements will remain in effect through 2025. But the enhanced subsidy availability for 2026 and future years is still up in the air. If the ARP’s subsidy enhancements are not eventually made permanent, reinsurance will once again be an important tool that states can use to make coverage more affordable for people with income above 400% of the poverty level.
In addition to the creation of a state-run health insurance exchange, SB732, also creates an “easy enrollment” program in Virginia, similar to a program that Maryland debuted in 2020 (several other states have since established or are establishing their own easy enrollment protocols).
Virginia’s will be phased in over the next few years. It adds a line to the Virginia tax return asking filers whether they were insured during the year. For those who were uninsured, the tax form will ask if they consent to have the information from their tax return shared with the Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services (and once it’s up and running, the newly created Virginia Health Benefit Exchange) to be used to determine whether the household might be eligible for Medicaid or premium subsidies.
The state’s 2021 tax return does include a box that filers can check to indicate that they are uninsured and would like the state Department of Revenue to share their applicable information with the state Medicaid office.
Virginia lawmakers passed legislation in 2018 to allow short-term plans to have durations up to 364 days (S.B.844), to expand access to association health plans (S.B.934 and S.B.935) and to direct the state to seek permission from the federal government to allow anyone to purchase a catastrophic plan in the individual market (S.B.964).
But former Governor Northan vetoed all four bills, based on concerns that they would “put Virginians at risk of being underinsured, result in rapidly increasing Marketplace premiums, and undermine key protections in the Affordable Care Act.”
At that point, Virginia had somewhat convoluted rules for short-term plans. Federal regulations finalized by the Trump administration in 2018 allow short-term plans to have terms of up to 364 days (and total duration, including renewals, of up to three years), and there were short-term plans available in Virginia (from out-of-state association group plans) with 364-day terms. But the legislation that Northam vetoed would have relaxed the rules across the board in Virginia.
Lawmakers took the opposite approach in 2020, with successful legislation that restricts short-term health plans to terms of no more than three months; this took effect in July 2021.
Under ACA rules, catastrophic plans are only available to people who are under the age of 30 or eligible for a hardship exemption from the ACA’s individual mandate. If S.B.964 had been enacted, Virginia would have sought permission to relax these rules and allow anyone to purchase a catastrophic plan.
Catastrophic plans are compliant with the ACA, in that they cover all of the essential health benefits, have the same out-of-pocket maximums as other plans, cover pre-existing conditions, and cannot impose lifetime or annual benefit limits. But they are in separate risk adjustment pools, which means that premiums collected from people on catastrophic plans (who tend to be healthier than average) are not being used to provide risk adjustment funding for metal level plans (particularly on the higher end of the metal scale, these plans tend to have enrollees who are sicker than average).
Similar bills, to expand short-term plans (S.B.1240) and allow anyone to purchase catastrophic health insurance (H.B.2260) passed in the 2019 session but were also vetoed by Northam.
The Charlottesville, Virginia area made headlines in the fall of 2017, when it became apparent that 2018 individual market rate hikes in that area would be roughly triple what they had been in 2017 for people who didn’t qualify for premium subsidies (for those who did qualify for premium subsidies, the subsidies grew substantially in 2018 to keep the after-subsidy premiums affordable).
The small-group market, however, is much more stable than the individual market, as is the case in most states. In an effort to address the situation and provide access to affordable coverage for some people impacted by the subsidy cliff, Governor Northam signed S.B.672 into law in April 2018; it took effect in July 2018. The legislation, sponsored by Senator Creigh Deeds (D, 25th District), allows self-employed people, including a sole member of an LLC or a sole shareholder of a corporation, to be considered “small employers” and thus purchase coverage in the small group market, as of July 2018. From the text of the legislation:
“Small employer” means in connection with a group health plan or health insurance coverage with respect to a calendar year and a plan year, an employer who employed an average of at least one but not more than 50 employees on business days during the preceding calendar year and who employs at least one employee on the first day of the plan year. In determining whether a corporation or limited liability company employed an average of at least one individual during the preceding calendar year and employed at least one employee on the first day of the plan year, an individual who performed any service for remuneration under a contract of hire, written or oral, express or implied, for a (i) corporation of which the individual is its sole shareholder or an immediate family member of such sole shareholder or (ii) a limited liability company of which the individual is its sole member or an immediate family member of such sole member, shall be deemed to be an employee of the corporation or the limited liability company, respectively. “Small employer” includes a self-employed individual. (emphasis added).
Self-employed individual” means an individual who derives a substantial portion of his income from a trade or business (i) operated by the individual as a sole proprietor, (ii) through which the individual has attempted to earn taxable income, and (iii) for which he has filed the appropriate Internal Revenue Service Form 1040, Schedule C or F, for the previous taxable year. (all emphasis added to clarify the requirements of the bill).
That appears to conflict with the ACA, which requires a small business to have at least one employee in addition to the owner (and not a spouse of the owner) in order to enroll in a plan in the small group market. Indeed, the impact statement for S.B.672 notes that the legislation “may conflict with the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.”
The Virginia Bureau of Insurance confirmed that the statute “is interpreted as meaning a small group plan will be an option for an entity with 1-50 employees,” and clarified that self-employed people — without any additional employees — would be able to purchase coverage in the small group market, year-round, under the terms of the legislation.
The Virginia Bureau of Insurance clarifies several questions about the new law in an administrative letter published in June 2018. The BOI noted that “federal law shall not be construed to preempt any state law that does not “prevent the application” of the ACA. This provision grants states the flexibility to enact laws and regulations that broaden the protections in the ACA, but that do not inhibit them. SB 672 does not prevent the application of the ACA in the sense that it broadens the definition of “small employer,” and does not limit it further than contemplated by the ACA.”
In other words, because the state is making ACA-compliant coverage more available (ie, allowing sole proprietors to buy ACA-compliant coverage in the small group market) rather than less available, the state is taking the position that the new law is not in conflict with federal rules. The federal government hasn’t commented on Virginia’s new law.
Allowing a self-employed person without any employees to purchase a small group plans is very different from the concept of allowing self-employed people to join associations and thus gain access to large group plans (which is what the Trump Administration allowed; that regulation has been blocked by a federal judge).
It’s noteworthy that a similar law was vetoed in Iowa in 2018, with the governor ostensibly basing the veto on concerns about destabilizing the insurance market and on the fact that the law would conflict with federal rules. But Iowa’s governor had previously signed legislation to allow non-ACA-compliant Farm Bureau plans to be sold in the state, which will have the obvious result of destabilizing the ACA-compliant market.
The small group market and individual market are subject to nearly identical regulations under the ACA. Age rating restrictions (no more than three times as much for older people versus a 21-year-old), guaranteed-issue coverage, coverage for the essential health benefits, plans that fit into the metal level categories — all of these regulations apply to both the individual and small group markets.
But one key difference is the availability of coverage. Small group plans are available year-round, as long as the employer meets the insurer’s minimum participation requirements (for employers that don’t meet the minimum participation requirements, coverage is available for purchase between November 15 and December 15 each year, but a self-employed person without any employees would have 100 percent participation, since he or she would be the only eligible employee). In the individual market, however, coverage is only available during open enrollment (November 1 to December 15) or during limited special enrollment periods, many of which require that the person already had coverage before the qualifying event that triggered the special enrollment period.
Virginia regulators are interpreting S.B.672 as allowing a self-employed person (without employees) unrestricted access to the small group market as an alternative to the individual market. It’s easy to see how that might incentivize people who are self-employed to skip coverage in the individual market, and then enroll in a small-group plan mid-year, if and when they end up needing health care.
It’s worth noting, however, that the language of the bill (in bold and underlined above) prevents a person from becoming “self-employed” in order to immediately obtain health insurance. The legislation requires that the person had already filed a self-employment tax return for the previous year. So although the law took effect in July 2018, the only self-employed people who were able to take advantage of it in 2018 were those who filed a 2017 tax return indicating that they were self-employed. That provision remains in force going forward, so self-employed people (without any employees) can only enroll in small group coverage for 2020 if they can provide a self-employed tax return from 2019.
The advocacy group Charlottesville for Reasonable Health Insurance has created a tool that self-employed Virginia residents can use to see how much a small group plan would cost. Healthcare.gov has a rate browsing tool that people can use to see how much individual market coverage would be, but small group coverage generally isn’t available for instant online quoting. So the new tool makes it easy for people to see how much they could potentially save by purchasing a small group plan instead of an individual market plan.
In a direct primary care agreement, a patient pays a doctor a set fee each month, in return for unlimited access to a predetermined range of primary care treatments. Such arrangements are not considered minimum essential coverage under the ACA, but questions remain at the state level in terms of whether direct primary care arrangements should be subject to insurance regulations and oversight from the state insurance department. Virginia has decided that the answer is no. During the 2017 legislative session, lawmakers passed H.B.2053 (and the companion senate bill, S.B.800) and Governor Terry McAuliffe signed the legislation into law.
Virginia’s law specifies that direct primary care arrangements are not insurance, which means they are not subject to Virginia’s insurance laws and regulatory oversight. The legislation includes specific details that must be communicated to direct primary care enrollees, including the fact that the arrangement is not insurance, provides only limited benefits, and does not meet the ACA’s coverage requirements.
[The year before, during the 2016 legislative session, lawmakers had passed HB685, a similar bill that would have exempted direct primary care plans from Virginia’s insurance laws and regulations. Governor McAuliffe vetoed HB685 in May 2016, but he signed H.B.2053 into law the following year, allowing direct primary care plans to be exempt from Virginia’s insurance regulations.]
Grandmothered plans are pre-2014 health insurance that was purchased after the ACA was signed into law (ie, they’re not grandfathered under the ACA). In the fall of 2013, and then in subsequent years through 2019, the Obama Administration and then the Trump Administration have announced transitional fixes to allow existing health plans to continue to renew until as late as October 2020, with coverage continuing until the end of December 2020 (this may well be extended again in the future).
Virginia was initially one of 15 states that did not accept the HHS proposal to allow grandmothered (transitional) health plans to remain in force past the end of 2014, and some reports indicated that as many as 250,000 people were going to need to transition to new coverage at the end of 2014.
But in November 2014, Virginia lawmakers passed House Bill 5011 and Senate Bill 5014, which allowed policies slated for cancellation to renew again under the terms allowed by HHS. Carriers were not required to renew plans at the end of 2014, but were given the option to do so. Ultimately, most of the carriers in the Virginia market determined that they were already too far along in the process of switching to ACA-compliant plans, and only Golden Rule and Freedom Life opted to allow transitional plans to renew at the end of 2014. Virginia is allowing insurers to continue grandmothered plans as allowed by the federal government, leaving renewal decisions up to Golden Rule and Freedom Life.
Former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, a Republican, opposed the Affordable Care Act. But along with the Republican-controlled General Assembly, he was conflicted as how best to resist the law’s implementation in the state.
In a 2011 letter to state legislative leaders, McDonnell wrote of extreme difficulty in determining whether “ceding control of an exchange to the federal government or creating our own is in the Commonwealth’s best interest.” The governor’s and General Assembly’s actions over the next few years reflected their shared reluctance to implement either option.
In August 2010, McDonnell appointed the Health Reform Initiative Advisory Council. The council issued a report in December 2010 and recommended that Virginia implement a state-based exchange.
The Virginia General Assembly passed legislation in 2010 to invalidate the individual mandate of the Affordable Care Act, and the state attorney general filed a lawsuit against Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services at that point, based on the new law. After a series of legal actions, the state law was ultimately ruled invalid.
In 2011, the General Assembly passed legislation that was supportive of a state-based exchange, and McDonnell signed the bill into law. However, throughout the 2012 session the General Assembly failed to pass additional legislation necessary to move ahead with exchange implementation.
In January 2014, Governor Terry McAuliffe was inaugurated in Virginia, and unlike McDonnell, McAuliffe was very supportive of the ACA and of Medicaid expansion in Virginia. His successor, Ralph Northam, is also a supporter of the ACA and was successful in expanding Medicaid in Virginia as of 2019.
Finally, after President Obama’s re-election in 2012, McDonnell notified HHS that Virginia would not proceed with a state-based exchange nor Medicaid expansion. While the norm for the federally operated exchange leaves no role for the state, McDonnell did lobby for oversight of the health plans that operate on the exchange within the state; Virginia became one of seven states with a marketplace plan management exchange.
HHS approved McDonnell’s request in March 2013, and the federally-run exchange opened for business in October 2013, with health plans overseen by the state Division of Insurance.
Although Virginia uses the HealthCare.gov enrollment platform, the state has a website — Cover Virginia — that provides information about Medicaid and FAMIS, along with eligibility for premium and cost-sharing subsidies in the exchange.
As of 2021, Virginia has a state-based marketplace, but still uses HealthCare.gov’s call center and enrollment platform. By 2023, however, Virginia plans to be operating its own exchange platform, and no longer using HealthCare.gov.
Virginia Health Care Foundation
Virginia Consumer Assistance Program
Assists people insured by private health plans, Medicaid, or other plans in resolving problems pertaining to their health coverage; assists uninsured residents with access to care.
(877) 310-6560 / [email protected]
State Exchange Profile: Virginia
The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation overview of Virginia’s progress toward creating a state health insurance exchange.
Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org. Her state health exchange updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts.
Virginia regulations limit the initial duration of temporary health insurance plans to three months.
Virginia implemented Medicaid expansion in 2019, and more than 693,000 Virginians have gained coverage as a result.
As of 2021, Virginia requires Medigap insurers to offer at least one plan to disabled beneficiaries under age 65.
Find affordable individual and family plans, small-group, short-term or Medicare plans.
Learn about adult and pediatric dental insurance options in Virginia, including stand-alone dental and coverage through the state's marketplace.
Our state guides offer up-to-date information about ACA-compliant individual and family plans and marketplace enrollment; Medicaid expansion status and Medicaid eligibility; short-term health insurance regulations and short-term plan availability; and Medicare plan options.