| ||||
Consider the health insurance exchange – it would appear to be an arcane, technical concept that only an actuary could love. And yet, this core provision of the federal health reform law has become a hot topic, taken up by vociferous opponents of "Obamacare" as another dart to fling at reform to deflate it once and for all.
The average insurance consumer could be forgiven for throwing up her hands at the political flamethrowing and ignoring the whole debate over exchanges. But that would be a mistake.
Because the exchange – envisioned as an easy-to-use, online insurance marketplace for consumers who need an individual health plan – is the heart of health reform and the piece that will impact consumers most directly.
In theory, using an exchange could be much simpler than the current way that people buy insurance (for the approximately 15 percent of the U.S. population who don't get coverage from an employer, Medicaid or Medicare). Right now, consumers have to dig through technical jargon and complicated premiums, copays, deductibles and hidden exclusions to compare one plan with another.
As envisioned by the federal health reform law, an online exchange would have simple, side-by-side comparisons of health plans. Depending on how the exchange is set up, it could also prescreen the health plans available to make sure they are comprehensive and as affordable as possible. The exchanges could pull together large groups of people – such as combining both individuals and employees of small businesses – to make a bigger pool and keep prices down.
Each state is supposed to have an exchange up and running by 2014, or leave its state's consumers to use a federal exchange instead.
But at this stage of the game, states are all over the place on adopting and implementing exchanges. Some states are far ahead of others on designing their exchanges, while a few have refused to participate at all, for political reasons.
07/29/2011 6:07 PM --
America has always been defined by progress. Yet the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has elements in many states trying to turn back time. Louisiana, with it’s barrel-bottom ranking of the 49th healthiest state to live in, adds to a growing list of states bucking reform as its governor refuses to set up a federally-mandated health insurance exchange, those [...]
05/03/2011 8:05 PM --
Today, we received a reminder from our friends at Families USA that the road to health reform has plenty of potholes ahead. A statement from Families USA condemns House Republican plans to vote on a bill to block the delivery of ACA grants that are intended to help states establish health insurance exchanges – the [...]
05/18/2010 11:05 PM --
The thing I always hated about buying a car was the grueling trek from dealership to dealership to dealership, hoping to find the right make and model with the right features. Mostly, I detested the inevitable struggle to get the car salesman to reveal the real bottom-line price of the car I wanted. Yuck. Buying [...]
11/18/2011 10:11 PM -- The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires that all health insurance plans sold on state exchanges beginning Jan. 1, 2014 cover ten essential benefits: Ambulatory patient services Emergency services Hospitalization Maternity and newborn care Mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment Prescription drugs Rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices Laboratory services Preventive [...]
11/18/2011 4:11 PM -- When the exchanges first get up and running, they are designed to provide insurance only to individuals (including families) and to small businesses (one to 100 employees). Eventually, they may expand to offer group insurance to larger employers, but that is up to each state to decide.
11/18/2011 4:11 PM -- The health reform law includes an individual mandate, requiring every American to have health coverage, with just a few exceptions. It includes a penalty for anyone who does not buy health insurance. The penalties are phased in: the penalty is the greater of $95 or 1% of income in 2014; $325 or 2% of income [...]