After two years of using a technologically-troubled state-based enrollment system, Hawaii is using the Healthcare.gov enrollment platform as of the 2016 open enrollment period (more details below). However, the exchange is considered a federally-supported state-based marketplace, and the state of Hawaii has retained control over much of the exchange’s functions.
11,949 Hawaii residents had enrolled in private plans through Healthcare.gov by January 9 (although the Hawaii Division of Insurance had put the number higher – at about 12,500 – by December 24). All 2015 enrollees had to re-enroll through Healthcare.gov by December 15 in order to have 2016 coverage effective in January, although open enrollment continues until the end of January.
There was significant discrepancy in 2015 regarding enrollment totals (see details below). In November, the exchange was reporting that 30,000 people needed to re-enroll through Healthcare.gov to have coverage effective January 1. But according to HHS, fewer than 17,000 people had enrolled in 2015 – and many of them no longer had in-force coverage when open enrollment began on November 1.
Special enrollment period for COFA nation residents
But the state and CMS both agree that there have been difficulties with the enrollment process for some enrollees. The most significant problems were experienced with enrollments from the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and Palau (Compact of Free Association – COFA – nations), due to language barriers in the enrollment process.
To address the issue, CMS established a special enrollment period for people from COFA nations. It runs for 60 days, from December 18 to February 16, and coverage will be retroactive to January 1 to ensure there’s no gap in coverage.
Language barriers, time zones hinder re-enrollments
In addition to language barriers, Hawaii’s location has proved challenging aswell. Although Healthcare.gov and its call center are available 24 hours a day, the Special Marketplace Assister line operates on Eastern Time. Hawaii is five hours behind Eastern Time, which means the help line is not available during Hawaii’s peak enrollment hours. During an exchange board meeting in early November 2015, Hawaii Health Connector’s Executive Director, Jeff Kissel, detailed the problems that the state was encountering in their switch to Healthcare.gov.
In addition to the time zone issue, enrollments were averaging an hour and 15 minutes, although that had spiked as high as four hours when an applicant is in need of a translator who can speak Hawaiian, and as high as two and a half hours for English-speakers.
Kissel noted that it was unrealistic to expect that all of the existing enrollees would be able to re-enroll through Healthcare.gov by December 15 due to the mitigating circumstances, and the exchange worked with CMS to establish the special enrollment period for COFA nation residents.
Regulators adjust proposed rates for 2016
Hawaii Health Connector offers individual plans from two carriers: BCBS’s Hawaii Medical Service Association (HMSA), and Kaiser Permanente. These are the only two carriers in the individual market in Hawaii, and both also offer plans outside the exchange.
For 2016, HMSA proposed a 45.5 percent rate increase for their individual HMO plan, and nearly a 50 percent rate hike for their individual PPO plan (49.1 percent overall). The carrier justified their rate hikes based on claims costs, explaining that while virtually everyone in Hawaii was already insured, the uninsured pool – many of whom purchased new ACA-compliant plans – had significant medical needs.
The following day, Kaiser proposed an 8.7 percent rate increase for their individual market policies.
Insurance Comissioner Gordon Ito said in June 2015 that HMSA’s proposed rates would be “closely scrutinized.” The prior year, Ito’s office announced that they had approved an 8.4 percent rate hike for HMSA’s transitional (grandmothered) plans, which was less than half of the 19 percent rate increase the carrier had requested – so clearly, the Commissioner does not shy away from rejecting excessive rate hikes. But Ito noted that if it turned out that the new rates proposed by HMSA are justified by claims costs, the Commissioner’s ability to lower the rates would be “limited.”
Ultimately, for 2016 individual market plans, MHSA ended up with a rate increase that was smaller than requested, while Kaiser’s rates increased much more than they had projected.
HMSA’s final approved average rate increase for 2016 is 27.32 percent, while Kaiser’s is 34.4 percent. Based on reported enrollment in November, that puts the overall weighted average rate increase in the exchange at about 30 percent for 2016. According to HHS, only about 61 percent of Hawaii’s enrollees in 2015 qualified for premium subsidies. But that number should be significantly higher in 2016, since rates have increased sharply. In Honolulu, the average benchmark premium for a 40-year-old is 31 percent more expensive in 2016 than it was in 2015. Subsidies are based on benchmark premiums, so subsidies in 2016 are larger than they were in 2015, and more enrollees are eligible for subsidies.
Assuming everyone keeps the same policy they had in 2015, HMSA’s rate increase for 2016 applies to about about 21,000 people, while Kaiser’s applies to about 13,000 people – but in both cases, the total includes on and off-exchange enrollments. And all of those enrollees are free to switch to a different plan during open enrollment.
There have been very conflicting reports about Hawaii Health Connector’s total enrollment over the last year and a half. The executive director’s report from July 2015 showed 33,479 individuals enrolled, but that’s dramatically higher than the 13,000 people who were reported to have enrolled during open enrollment. And HHS was reporting only 8,200 people with effectuated coverage as of March 31.
I contacted the exchange to clear up the confusion. Executive Director Jeff Kissel explained that the larger number is much more accurate. He said that the discrepancy stemmed from a significant lag time in enrollment reporting from carriers. Kissel confirmed that the Connector’s in-force enrollment numbers as of late July were roughly 20,000 people with HMSA and 11,000 people with Kaiser.
And by early September, when HHS released a report stating that Hawaii Health Connector’s effectuated enrollment as of June 30 stood at 8,802 people, Kissel noted that the actual total had grown to 35,600, and that the HHS report wasn’t including HMSA enrollments.
But in November 2015, Kaiser reported that just 7,300 of their 16,800 enrollees had used Hawaii Health Connector to purchase their coverage (the remaining 9,500 people enrolled directly through Kaiser). And HMSA reported that fewer than half of their enrollments (10,000 out of 21,000 total enrollees) had come through the exchange in 2015. At the same time, HHS reported that 16,803 people had enrolled in private plans through the Hawaii Health Connector in 2015.
These reports indicate that total enrollment might have been considerably lower than what was being reported by the exchange in 2015. In December 2015, Governor Ige noted that the state had “always had challenges getting accurate numbers from the Connector.” and explained that the discrepancies might be “one of the reasons the federal government had concerns.”
According to Hawaii Health Connector, since the marketplace launched in the fall of 2013, about 60,000 people have enrolled in Medicaid through Hawaii’s marketplace, including nearly 33,000 who enrolled between November 2014 and February 2015. The state expanded Medicaid under the ACA, and as a result the uninsured population has been reduced. US census data found that the uninsured rate in 2013 was 6.7 percent, and that it had dropped to 5.3 percent in 2014; no doubt their data will find that it’s continued to decline in 2015.
First state to post 1332 waiver draft
In September 2015, Hawaii became the first state to post a draft 1332 innovation waiver. The waivers provide an opportunity for states to create their own unique approach to healthcare reform, although they must be budget-neutral for the federal government, and must also provide health insurance coverage for at least as many people as would be covered under the ACA without a waiver. But beyond some basic framework, the waivers give states a large degree of flexibility.
Hawaii’s proposed waiver seeks to align the ACA with the state’s existing Prepaid Health Care Act, which has been the law in Hawaii since 1974. Under the Prepaid Healthcare Act, employees who work at least 20 hours a week have to be offered employer-sponsored health insurance, and can’t be asked to pay more than 1.5 percent of their wages for employee-only coverage (as opposed to 9.66 percent in 2016 under the ACA). In it’s 1332 waiver, Hawaii “seeks to maintain all aspects of the innovative Hawaii Prepaid Health Care Act and proposes to waive provisions in Sections 1301, 1304, 1311, and 1312 of the Affordable Care Act that diminish it.”
Hawaii wants to eliminate the SHOP exchange, since they already have an employer-sponsored insurance system that they believe is more effective and affordable for employers than the ACA’s SHOP exchange. Enrollment in SHOP has been very low in Hawaii (as has been the case in most states), and only one of the state’s five group insurance carriers offered plans through SHOP. The state-run SHOP exchange shut down in June 2015 as part of the transition to a federally-supported state-based marketplace, and small businesses have just been enrolling directly through Kaiser (the only carrier that was participating in SHOP) since then.
But Hawaii’s waiver doesn’t seek to make changes to the way health insurance is provided for individual coverage under the ACA. So people in Hawaii who aren’t eligible for employer-sponsored health insurance (which is very few people, given the requirements in the Prepaid Health Care Act) would still have access to the ACA’s premium subsidies and cost-sharing subsidies through Healthcare.gov.
Hawaii wants their waiver to be approved in time to implement it starting in January 2017.
Audit alleges wasted funds
In September 2015, the Hawaii state auditor released an audit report that found Hawaii Health Connector wasted more than $11.6 million in taxpayer funds due to a poorly-executed contract with Mansha Consulting, an IT firm. Mansha was the Connector’s second-largest contractor, with a total contract worth $21.6 million ($15.3 million was ultimately paid, and Mansha claims that they are still owed additional money from the Connector). The audit alleges that the exchange didn’t use proper procedures to determine which IT contractor should get the job, and that they didn’t clearly define the job that was to be done or have systems in place to amend contracts. The audit was strongly worded, noting that “the Connector board’s and management’s inattention to contract administration constituted abuse of public funds.”
In a response to the audit, Hawaii Health Connector noted that it “shared [the auditor’s] concerns about Mansha and other significant contractors and have worked to improve [the Connector’s] procurement and contract management practices.” But Kissel also said that the audit report is an “unctuous elaboration of the obvious,” stating that he had “no idea what the basis is for the $11 million — it doesn’t tie to anything that have been in our records and our records have been audited by our auditors.”
Ultimately – during the course of the audit – Hawaii Health Connector opted to become a supported state-based marketplace and use Healthcare.gov’s enrollment platform, so the exchange’s prior IT spending is water under the bridge at this point. But the audit report states that even as the exchange winds down its operations, “it is imperative that its activities be transparent and accountable and its records accessible.”
Switching to Healthcare.gov
In June 2015, the Hawaii Health Connector Board approved a plan to transition to Healthcare.gov by October, in time for the 2016 open enrollment period that began November 1. The exchange is now a federally-supported state-based model, similar to Oregon, Nevada, and New Mexico. Healthcare.gov handles enrollment, but the state will continue to oversee customer service and outreach.
Initially, the exchange was slated to cease its operations by September 2015. But in late August, the Connector reached an agreement with the state and federal governments to allow them to continue to provide outreach and enrollment assistance during the 2016 open enrollment, with state will paying roughly $3.3 million, and the federal government contributing $2.8 million. With this funding, it was expected that the Connector would remain operational for outreach activities through October 2016, with enrollments conducted through Healthcare.gov. From May – October 2016, according to Kissel, the funding was primarily expected to be used for “doing whatever the Legislature requires of us in order to finish closing down and transferring operations.”
In early November, 2015, Hawaii Health Connector’s executive director, Jeff Kissel, announced that he would leave the exchange in December in order to take a position with the Energy Policy Research Foundation Inc. in Washington, D.C. Kissel had been appointed to lead the exchange in October 2014, and was the third executive director at Hawaii Health Connector. When Kissel’s departure was announced, Hawaii Health Connector still had 22 staff members and was scheduled to continue outreach activities until October 2016.
Exchange winds down sooner than planned
But on November 19, amid concerns that the exchange had run out of money, the exchange’s executive committee voted to recommend that Hawaii Health Connector speed up the transition of remaining exchange functions to the state of Hawaii. In a press release regarding the move to shutter the exchange sooner than anticipated, Governor Ige noted that “the Connector’s ongoing financial challenges have forced the state to accelerate the transition beginning December 1, 2015.”
As a result of the abrupt shut-down of Hawaii Health Connector, the state is working out a contract with local IT company ike/DataHouse, to ensure that Forms 1095-A are processed and mailed to enrollees and the IRS for 2015.
Phase 1 of the Hawaii Health Connector’s transition plan, continued through the end of July 2015 and included transferring plan management functions. Phase 2 (initially scheduled for August through December) includes transferring IT data, as well as transferring portions of the exchange to various state agencies. Phase 3 (initially scheduled for January through April 2016) involves winding down the exchange’s IT systems, transferring IRS reporting to the federal system, archiving data, and other tasks to finish up the transition. Phase 2 and 3 have been accelerated as a result of the state’s decision to wind down the exchange more quickly than anticipated.
The exchange worked throughout the fall to train people in the community who will be able to take over outreach efforts once the exchange is no longer functioning as its own entity. One of the challenges involved with the transition is that while Healthcare.gov supports enrollment in numerous languages, there are languages spoken in Hawaii that are not available on Healthcare.gov. So the exchange is working with the state to make sure that effective outreach and enrollment assistance will remain available once the state absorbs the remaining functions of the exchange. This process is working, but challenges remain – hence the special enrollment period in early 2016 for people from COFA nations.
The Hawaii House in 2014 considered a bill that would have made the marketplace a state agency as a way to address the poor performance of the Connector. However, with some legislators worried about taking on the marketplace’s revenue problems, lawmakers eventually passed a bill that continued the Health Connector as an independent nonprofit in 2015. That is no longer the case in 2016, now that the exchange’s remaining duties have been transferred to the state.
Funding issues led to demise
In May 2015, the Hawaii legislature approved just $2 million in funding for Hawaii Health Connector – a far cry from the $10 million the exchange had requested. Lawmakers has been considering up to $5.4 million for the exchange, but ultimately approved less than half that amount (SB 1028 is the legislation that granted the $2 million).
HHS notified the state in March that Hawaii Health Connector wasn’t complying with the requirement that it be financially self-sustaining as of January 2015. As a result, the federal government began preparations for a possible transition to Healthcare.gov, and the remaining $70 million in federal funding for the exchange was frozen ($204 million had been allocated to the Hawaii Health Connector; $130 million had already been spent by the time the federal government notified the exchange that a switch to Healthcare.gov would likely be necessary).
The funding issue was a major problem for the exchange, leaving them with essentially no choice but to transition to Healthcare.gov. Exchange officials were in a race against the clock in May, attempting to secure additional funding. But they also prepared the contingency plan that was ultimately put into motion in early June.
Two contractors that performed services for Hawaii Health Connector did so in 2015 without a contract, but under the assumption that they would eventually be paid using the remaining federal grant money. They’re trying to recoup $2.7 million in payment from Hawaii Health Connector, but it’s unclear whether they will be successful.
In January 2015, Executive Director Jeffrey Kissel (who took over the exchange in October 2014) acknowledged “deficiencies in the planning process, procurement, and governance” following the release of a highly critical state audit. The audit found inadequate planning by the Connector’s board of directors led to an unsustainable health exchange, and improper procurement processes, contract administration, and financial oversight put federal grants at risk.
The Connector’s eligibility system was not integrated with the state’s Medicaid system, which is another reason the exchange wasn’t compliant with federal regulations. The disconnect caused significant delays, as the enrollment process required that all consumers seeking coverage through the marketplace first be screened for Medicaid eligibility. Those deemed ineligible for Medicaid continue through the enrollment process toward selecting private health insurance.
Hawaii Health Connector suspended payments to Mansha Consulting, the vendor responsible for data transfers between the exchange and the Medicaid system. Mansha representatives say the company is owed $4.2 million for work already completed. A state audit found that Mansha didn’t dedicate the agreed upon number of workers, and both the acting state auditor and a legal team hired by Hawaii Health Connector are continuing to evaluate if Mansha delivered contracted services.
Another major problem with Hawaii Health Connector was the lack of anonymous browsing. Consumers had to create an account before they could compare plans. That same design flaw was a major source of congestion and frustration with the original version of HealthCare.gov, the federal marketplace. HealthCare.gov was revamped to allow browsing, and Hawaii Health Connector officials had hoped to make the feature available on the state exchange at some point.
Hawaii Health Connector’s small business exchange originally had two carriers (HMSA and Kaiser), but HMSA announced in August 2014 that they would not be offering small business plans through the Connector starting in 2015, due mainly to the technological problems with the exchange. That left Kaiser as the only small business option on the Connector in 2015.
For 2016, Kaiser is once again the only small business carrier offering plans in the Hawaii exchange. But there are four carriers that offer small business plans outside the exchange: HMSA, United Health Alliance, Hawaii Medical Assurance Association (HMAA), and Family Health Hawaii.
As part of the state’s proposed 1332 waiver, Hawaii is seeking to end the SHOP exchange, as it’s considered a cumbersome, expensive means of providing employer-sponsored health insurance in a state where employer-sponsored health insurance for just about everyone has been the norm for four decades. Hawaii’s SHOP exchange only has 232 enrollees, and they had to switch to direct enrollment through a carrier when the SHOP exchange shut down in June (as part of Hawaii’s transition to a federally-supported state-based marketplace).
Insurmountable financial challenges
In addition to administrative and technical problems, Hawaii Health Connector faced financial challenges, mostly because of relatively low enrollment and a small pool of eligible enrollees. Federal funding for state-run marketplace operations ran out at the end of 2014. The state allocated $1.5 million of a $4 million request to fund exchange operations through June 2015, the end of the fiscal year.
Hawaii Health Connector planned to use a 2 percent fee on premiums to fund its ongoing operations. Given low enrollment, the premium fee wasn’t generating enough revenue to meet annual expenses, estimated at anywhere between $4.5 and $15 million, according to the Associated Press.
As of July 2014, Hawaii had about 75,000 uninsured residents — about 6 percent of the population. About half of them were expected to qualify for Medicaid — meaning the market for the Connector was less than 40,000 (from 2013 to June 2015, Medicaid/CHIP enrollment in Hawaii grew by nearly 40,000 people). Marketplace officials spent much of 2014 looking for alternative funding models as well as ways to cut expenses.
Hawaii Health Connector had expected to break even by 2022 if operating costs had remained stable. The Hawaii Senate in 2015 approved a bill that would allow Hawaii Health Connector to issue up to $28 million in state bonds over ten years to fund its operations until it becomes self-supporting. However, a House committee stripped the bonding provision from the bill.
In another effort to prop up the exchange, the state Senate also approved SB 1338, which included several measures to increase the number of potential Hawaii Health Connector customers (the bill did not pass however; the House added amendments that the Senate didn’t approve). The bill would have allowed employers with up to 100 employees – instead of 50 – use the small business exchange beginning in 2017 (ultimately, SHOP enrollment ceased in May 2015 in order to allow the exchange to transition to Healthcare.gov). The bill would have also required, starting in 2020, that individuals eligible for COBRA plans be informed that affordable coverage can be purchased through the Connector.
Grandmothered plans can renew again
SB 1338 would also have ended enrollment in transitional or “grandmothered” health plans at the end of 2015 (current provisions in the state allow grandmothered plans to continue to renew until October 2016, and remain in force until September 2017). The House did not take up the measure however, and transitional plans are still allowed to renew until October 2016 in Hawaii, if allowed by the carrier.
ACA presented unique challenge for Hawaii
Many of the concerns that prompted national health care reform and the 2010 passage of the Affordable Care Act are not prominent in Hawaii. Some experts have even raised concerns that the Affordable Care Act is a threat to the quality of health insurance coverage in Hawaii. Long before the ACA brought health reform to the whole country, Hawaii already enjoyed a low uninsured rate, health insurance plans were required cover a core set of benefits, and employer-provided coverage was quite affordable.
This good state of affairs is largely due to the Hawaii Prepaid Health Care Act, which was enacted in 1974. The Prepaid Health Care Act requires employers to provide health insurance to employees who work more than 20 hours a week and to pay 50 percent of premiums. “Affordability” for employees is defined as 1.5 percent of income, compared to 9.5 percent under the ACA.
Given Hawaii’s small population and its historically low uninsured rate, implementing a state-run exchange was a questionable financial decision. According to Kaiser Health News, the Hawaii Health Connector was the nation’s most expensive exchange on a per-enrollee basis: $23,899 per 2014 enrollee. As noted above, the small individual market in Hawaii made it difficult – impossible, really – for the exchange to be financially self-sustaining.
Hawaii health insurance exchange links
Hawaii Health Connector
State Exchange Profile: Hawaii
The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation overview of Hawaii’s progress toward creating a state health insurance exchange.