Q: My employer offers insurance, but I think it’s too expensive. Can I apply for a subsidy to help me buy my own insurance?
A: Probably not. If your employer’s insurance is “affordable” and provides “minimum value” (ie, is comprehensive), you are not eligible for a government subsidy to help buy a policy in the exchanges. You could still buy a plan in the exchange, but you’d have to pay full price for it, so it is extremely unlikely that you would get better and less expensive coverage in the exchange.
To be clear, there’s nothing preventing you from declining your employer’s insurance and buying an individual market plan, on or off-exchange. But in most cases, you won’t be eligible for a subsidy in the exchange, which means you’d be paying full price for an individual market plan. The plan your employer offers is funded partly by your employer, and you’ll lose that benefit if you opt for an individual market plan.
In 2017, a policy is considered “affordable” if individual coverage (for just you—not including your family—costs less than 9.69 percent of your household income in 2017). Household income is Modified Adjusted Gross Income as defined by the ACA.
It’s important to note that the affordability test for employer-sponsored coverage applies only to the amount you’d have to pay to insure just yourself under your employer’s plan. If that amount is less than 9.69 percent of your income, you’re not eligible for a premium subsidy in the exchange, and neither are your family members if they’re allowed to enroll in your employer’s plan, regardless of how much it would cost to actually enroll them in the group plan. This is known as the ACA’s “family glitch,” and although some lawmakers – and countless consumer advocates – have proposed fixes, it’s still an issue for upwards of two million Americans.
Your coverage is deemed to provide “minimum value” if it pays for 60 percent of covered benefits for the average population (ie, is comparable to a Bronze plan in the individual or small group market).
The employer-sponsored insurance offered at most large companies fits these definitions of providing “minimum value” and being “affordable.” Even prior to 2014, the vast majority of large companies already provided comprehensive health insurance, often covering most of the 10 essential benefits that the ACA now requires of individual and small group plans.
Income caps for subsidy eligibility
It’s unusual for an employer-sponsored plan to be considered unaffordable or to fail to provide minimum value (cover at least 60 percent of average costs).
But even if you’re eligible for a subsidy based on the coverage provided by your employer, you still have to qualify based on your household income (Modified Adjusted Gross Income, which is ACA-specific). If your income is above 400 percent of the poverty level, or if exchange plans in your area meet the definition of affordable at your income level even without subsidies, you would not be eligible for a subsidy.
Split family onto two plans?
If you’re covering your whole family on your employer’s plan, it’s worth finding out how much it would be to insure just yourself under your employer’s plan. If your employer subsidizes the cost of premiums for employees but not for dependents and spouses, it’s possible that the cost to cover your whole family would be lower if you split the family onto two plans, using an individual market plan for your family members and your employer-sponsored plan for yourself.
As noted above, your family members would not qualify for subsidies in the exchange (assuming your own coverage from your employer isn’t more than 9.69 percent of your household income), so you’d be comparing full-price exchange (or off-exchange) plans with the cost to cover your family on your employer’s plan.
Be sure to also consider the out-of-pocket costs on both options before you make a decision, and keep in mind that family deductibles and family out-of-pocket maximums only apply to all family members on a single plan; if your family is on two plans, each plan would have its own out-of-pocket limit.
Exchanges aren’t meant to replace employer-sponsored coverage
The exchanges were designed for folks who are self-employed, unemployed, or work for a company that doesn’t offer health benefits. Prior to the ACA’s premium subsidies, which are only available through the exchange, these folks had no choice but to pay the full cost of their health insurance premiums themselves.
Now that the exchanges are in place, people who would otherwise have had to pay full price for their own coverage can get relief in the form of premium subsidies if their household income doesn’t exceed 400 percent of the poverty level. They can also get cost-sharing subsidies, if their income doesn’t exceed 250 percent of the poverty level. And if their income is between zero and 138 percent of the poverty level, they’re eligible for Medicaid if they’re in one of the 31 states and DC that have expanded Medicaid.
Since you have benefits at work, your employer already is subsidizing your insurance. On average large companies pay 75 percent of premiums, asking workers to pay just 25 percent.
It is true that co-pays and deductibles have been rising, but that is because the underlying cost of health care has been climbing as hospital charges, specialists’ fees, and prices for drugs and medical devices rise. Your employer is likely still paying a significant share of the cost of your health insurance, and you’re receiving that as a pre-tax benefit.